본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Cold Snare Biopsy to Increase Diagnostic Accuracy in Patients With Suspected Colorectal Cancer Under Colonoscopy.

코호트 1/5 보강
Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques 📖 저널 OA 0% 2021: 0/1 OA 2022: 0/1 OA 2023: 0/2 OA 2024: 0/1 OA 2025: 0/7 OA 2026: 0/6 OA 2021~2026 2025 Vol.35(6)
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
2000 patients were enrolled in CSB group (n=411) and CFB group (n=1589).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
73/1589, 11/1589, 0/1589, 0/1589; P >0.05). [CONCLUSIONS] Compared with CFB, CSB is more effective in diagnosing suspected CRC without increasing adverse events.

Wu J, Li X

ℹ️ 이 논문은 무료 전문이 아직 없습니다. 코퍼스 전체의 43.9%는 무료 가능 (통계 →) · 🏥 기관 EZproxy로 시도

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND AND AIMS] Cold forceps biopsy (CFB) is commonly used for the suspected diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 411
  • p-value P = 0.002
  • 95% CI 1.026-1.045
  • 연구 설계 cohort study

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Wu J, Li X (2025). Cold Snare Biopsy to Increase Diagnostic Accuracy in Patients With Suspected Colorectal Cancer Under Colonoscopy.. Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques, 35(6). https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001412
MLA Wu J, et al.. "Cold Snare Biopsy to Increase Diagnostic Accuracy in Patients With Suspected Colorectal Cancer Under Colonoscopy.." Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques, vol. 35, no. 6, 2025.
PMID 41099425 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND AND AIMS] Cold forceps biopsy (CFB) is commonly used for the suspected diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). With larger pathologic specimens, cold snare biopsy (CSB) of CRC may be an attractive alternative. We performed a cohort study to compare the effectiveness and safety of CSB to CFB.

[METHODS] Suspected CRC patients were retrospective and prospectively included and assigned to CFB or CSB at a single tertiary center. The primary outcome was the diagnostic consistency between endoscopic visual diagnosis and final biopsy tissue based on the duration required to determine diagnosis. And the diagnostic consistency between surgical postoperative pathology and final biopsy tissue. Secondary outcomes were clinically significant CSB or CFB-related bleeding, perforation, and technical success.

[RESULTS] A total of 2000 suspected CRCs in 2000 patients were enrolled in CSB group (n=411) and CFB group (n=1589). The technical success rate of the 2 groups was 100%. Two groups were significantly different for diagnostic consistency: 411/411 (100.0%), 381/411 (92.7%) CSB versus CFB 1438/1589 (90.5%), 1388/1589 (87.35%) (OR 1.035 and 1.839; 95% CI: 1.026-1.045 and 1.233-2.744; P <0.001 and P = 0.002). Bleeding and perforation occurred similarly in the 2 groups (16/411, 2/411, 0/411, 0/411 vs. 73/1589, 11/1589, 0/1589, 0/1589; P >0.05).

[CONCLUSIONS] Compared with CFB, CSB is more effective in diagnosing suspected CRC without increasing adverse events.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반