How to stratify the risk of thrombosis for esthetic plastic surgery? The proposal of a new scale.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS 2023 Vol.83() p. 361-372

Cuenca-Pardo J, Ramos-Gallardo G, Morales-Olivera M, Contreras-Bulnes L, Bucio-Duarte J, Iribarren-Moreno R, Vélez-Benítez E, Domínguez-Millán R, Salmean-Piña O

Abstract

Scales to qualify the risk of thrombosis do not include all thrombogenic factors that are generated in esthetic plastic surgery. Methods: We performed a systematic review to assess the risk of thrombosis in plastic surgery. Thrombogenic factors in esthetic surgery were analyzed by a panel of experts. We proposed a scale with 2 versions. In the first version, factors were stratified according to their impact on the possible risk of thrombosis. The second version includes the same factors but in a simplified form. We evaluated the efficacy of the proposed scale by comparing it with the Caprini score; we scored the risk in 124 cases and controls. Results: Using the Caprini score, we found that 81.45% of the patients studied and 62.5% of the cases of thrombosis were observed in the low-risk group. Only 1 case of thrombosis was reported in the high-risk group. Using the stratified version of the scale, we found that the low-risk group comprised 25% of the patients, and there were no cases of thrombosis. The high-risk group included 14.51% of patients; 10 presented thrombosis (62.5%). The proposed scale was very effective in detecting both low-risk and high-risk patients undergoing esthetic surgery procedures.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
질환 thrombosis C0040053
Thrombosis
scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Humans; Surgery, Plastic; Venous Thrombosis; Risk Assessment; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Thrombosis; Risk Factors; Venous Thromboembolism; Retrospective Studies