본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Impact of age on short-term outcomes and oncologic prognosis after radical surgery for colorectal cancer over 60.

코호트 1/5 보강
International journal of colorectal disease 📖 저널 OA 89% 2021: 1/3 OA 2022: 3/4 OA 2023: 2/3 OA 2025: 26/26 OA 2026: 33/33 OA 2021~2026 2025 Vol.40(1) p. 247
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
추출되지 않음
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
curative-intent surgery from January 2018 to December 2023 in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] Despite a higher burden of comorbidities and increased perioperative mortality, no statistically significant difference in long-term oncological outcomes was observed between AE and OE following rigorous patient selection and perioperative management in CRC patients. Advanced age alone should not preclude standard curative resection.

Chen JJ, Li ZL, Yang Y, Wang ZJ

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] Colorectal cancer (CRC) is becoming increasingly common in adults ≥ 60 years old, yet postoperative prognosis of curative-intent surgery for the advanced elderly (≥ 80 years) remains controv

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 800
  • p-value P < 0.001
  • 연구 설계 cohort study

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Chen JJ, Li ZL, et al. (2025). Impact of age on short-term outcomes and oncologic prognosis after radical surgery for colorectal cancer over 60.. International journal of colorectal disease, 40(1), 247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-05048-9
MLA Chen JJ, et al.. "Impact of age on short-term outcomes and oncologic prognosis after radical surgery for colorectal cancer over 60.." International journal of colorectal disease, vol. 40, no. 1, 2025, pp. 247.
PMID 41351632 ↗

Abstract

[PURPOSE] Colorectal cancer (CRC) is becoming increasingly common in adults ≥ 60 years old, yet postoperative prognosis of curative-intent surgery for the advanced elderly (≥ 80 years) remains controversial.

[METHODS] A retrospective cohort study included 971 CRC patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent curative-intent surgery from January 2018 to December 2023 in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital. Patients were stratified into "ordinary elderly group" (OE) (60-79 years, n = 800) and "advanced elderly group" (AE) (≥ 80 years, n = 171). Clinicopathological variables, 30-day morbidity/mortality, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were collected and analyzed the differences between the two groups. The study was presented in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist.

[RESULTS] The AE had more right-sided CRC (P < 0.001) and higher rate of preoperative obstruction (P < 0.001). They underwent more emergency (P = 0.002) and open procedures (P < 0.001), resulting in longer postoperative stays P = 0.030). Overall, 30-day morbidity was comparable (P = 0.76), but perioperative mortality rate was higher in AE (P = 0.041). The median follow-up was 36.1 ± 22.1 months, and recurrence rates (P = 0.58) and 5-year DFS (log-rank P = 0.42) did not differ between groups. Multivariate analysis identified TNM stage, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, preoperative intestinal obstruction, and proficient Mismatch Repair (pMMR) as independent predictors of DFS; age ≥ 80 years was not prognostic (p = 0.81).

[CONCLUSIONS] Despite a higher burden of comorbidities and increased perioperative mortality, no statistically significant difference in long-term oncological outcomes was observed between AE and OE following rigorous patient selection and perioperative management in CRC patients. Advanced age alone should not preclude standard curative resection.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기