본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

ERAS protocol vs. conventional care in elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Hatyai Hospital.

Frontiers in surgery 2025 Vol.12() p. 1710191

Prasitvarakul K, Paekaittiwong D, Tumviriyakul H, Khaimook A

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs and laparoscopic techniques independently reduce hospital stays and postoperative complications in patients with colorectal cancer.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 연구 설계 cohort study

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Prasitvarakul K, Paekaittiwong D, et al. (2025). ERAS protocol vs. conventional care in elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Hatyai Hospital.. Frontiers in surgery, 12, 1710191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1710191
MLA Prasitvarakul K, et al.. "ERAS protocol vs. conventional care in elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Hatyai Hospital.." Frontiers in surgery, vol. 12, 2025, pp. 1710191.
PMID 41459419

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs and laparoscopic techniques independently reduce hospital stays and postoperative complications in patients with colorectal cancer. However, evidence regarding whether the combination of ERAS protocols with laparoscopic surgery further improves postoperative outcomes remains limited.

[OBJECTIVE] The aim of the study was to compare the postoperative hospital stay (POHS) and perioperative outcomes between patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery under the ERAS protocol and conventional care.

[METHODS] This ambispective cohort study included patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma at Hatyai Hospital between June 2019 and May 2023. Patients were divided into a conventional group and an ERAS group. The primary outcome was POHS. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and 30-day readmission.

[RESULTS] A total of 140 patients were included (70 ERAS, 70 conventional). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, though the ERAS group had more preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) (52.9% vs. 39.4%;  = 0.002) and diverting stomas (38.6% vs. 21.4%;  = 0.042). The ERAS group had significantly shorter POHS (median 5.0 vs. 5.5 days;  < 0.001), earlier oral intake (3 vs. 4 days;  = 0.001), and earlier Jackson-Pratt (JP) drain removal ( = 0.006). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications, readmission, or mortality. Multivariate analysis identified early JP drain removal, early discontinuation of intravenous fluids, nasogastric tube avoidance, and multimodal analgesia as significant predictors of POHS ≤5 days.

[CONCLUSION] ERAS implementation in elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery significantly reduces hospital stay without increasing complication or readmission rates. These findings support the safety and effectiveness of ERAS in a regional Thai hospital setting and advocate for broader protocol adoption.