본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Tumor growth rate for prognostic stratification and treatment optimization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TACE combined with systemic therapy.

BMC gastroenterology 2026 Vol.26(1) p. 119

Chen G, Wang M, Huang X, Zhang Z, Wu Y, Chen X, Guo X, Zheng S, Zheng T, Chen H, Wu J, Zhang B

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Tumor growth rate (TGR) is a dynamic biomarker for evaluating therapeutic response and prognosis in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) with triple therapy, yet its clinical util

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.020
  • p-value p = 0.001
  • 95% CI 1.014-1.053

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Chen G, Wang M, et al. (2026). Tumor growth rate for prognostic stratification and treatment optimization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TACE combined with systemic therapy.. BMC gastroenterology, 26(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04596-2
MLA Chen G, et al.. "Tumor growth rate for prognostic stratification and treatment optimization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TACE combined with systemic therapy.." BMC gastroenterology, vol. 26, no. 1, 2026, pp. 119.
PMID 41555236

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Tumor growth rate (TGR) is a dynamic biomarker for evaluating therapeutic response and prognosis in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) with triple therapy, yet its clinical utility and role in guiding treatment optimization require further validation.

[METHODS] This study included 68 uHCC patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with systemic combination therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance baseline confounders. Cubic spline models explored nonlinear associations between TGR and survival risk and found the ideal cut-off points. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between TGR subgroups, Cox multivariate regression evaluated the independent prognostic value of TGR.

[RESULTS] Cox analysis confirmed TGR0 as an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.035, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.013-1.057, p = 0.020) and PFS (HR 1.033, 95%CI: 1.014-1.053, p = 0.001). After stratified for TGR0/TGR1 and matched, the low-TGR0 group showed significantly longer median OS (not reached vs. 13.09 months, p = 0.002) and PFS (12.11 vs. 4.38 months, p = 0.006) than the high-TGR0 group. In the subgroup analysis, after propensity score matching(PSM), the low-TGR1 group demonstrated a more favorable prognosis compared with high-TGR1(mOS: not reached vs. 16.97 months, p = 0.024; mOS1: not reached vs. 11.78 months, p = 0.022).

[CONCLUSIONS] Dynamic TGR monitoring identifies heterogeneous therapeutic responses, guiding timely personalized treatment adjustments and prognostic stratification in uHCC.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Liver Neoplasms; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Aged; Propensity Score; Combined Modality Therapy; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Retrospective Studies; Progression-Free Survival; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Sorafenib

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)