본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

The Effects of Lidocaine Patches on Post-Radiofrequency Ablation Pain in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

1/5 보강
Cancer medicine 2026 Vol.15(2) p. e71581
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
86 patients in the LP group and 68 patients in the PP group completed the study.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] VAS pain scores, the primary endpoint, were not significantly different between the two groups.

Chen CJ, Chen WY, Lin CY, Chiu YC, Chang YJ

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND AND AIM] Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a standard treatment for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.032
  • p-value p = 0.018

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Chen CJ, Chen WY, et al. (2026). The Effects of Lidocaine Patches on Post-Radiofrequency Ablation Pain in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.. Cancer medicine, 15(2), e71581. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71581
MLA Chen CJ, et al.. "The Effects of Lidocaine Patches on Post-Radiofrequency Ablation Pain in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.." Cancer medicine, vol. 15, no. 2, 2026, pp. e71581.
PMID 41692439
DOI 10.1002/cam4.71581

Abstract

[BACKGROUND AND AIM] Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a standard treatment for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, analgesics are often insufficient in mitigating post-RFA pain. The lidocaine patch is being investigated as an alternative for acute pain relief, though it has not yet been used for post-RFA pain. This study aims to evaluate the effect of lidocaine patches on post-RFA pain for patients with HCC.

[METHODS] Patients undergoing RFA treatment were randomly assigned to an intervention group, receiving lidocaine patches (LP group), or a control group, receiving placebo patches (PP group). The primary endpoint was the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score. The secondary endpoint was rescue analgesic use, quantified as the equivalent cumulative dose of residual morphine. Both were assessed concurrently every 4 h on the first day post-RFA.

[RESULTS] A total of 86 patients in the LP group and 68 patients in the PP group completed the study. Pain scores did not differ between the two groups at any time point. However, the equivalent cumulative dose of residual morphine was lower in the LP group compared to the PP group, with statistically significant differences at time points T4-T6 (p = 0.032, p = 0.018, and p = 0.032, respectively). After adjusting for confounding factors, multiple linear regression analysis yielded similar results.

[CONCLUSIONS] VAS pain scores, the primary endpoint, were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the objective equivalent cumulative dose of residual morphine was significantly reduced, implying that the lidocaine patch lowered residual systemic opioid exposure. We conclude that the lidocaine patch may be useful to reduce opioid use post-RFA.

[TRIAL REGISTRATION] ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05732181.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Lidocaine; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Female; Male; Liver Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Radiofrequency Ablation; Pain Measurement; Postoperative Pain; Transdermal Patch; Morphine; Analgesics, Opioid; Treatment Outcome

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)