본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Effect of Pathological Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Long-term Outcomes in Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Japanese Multicenter Study.

1/5 보강
Anticancer research 📖 저널 OA 5.4% 2021: 0/3 OA 2022: 0/8 OA 2023: 2/6 OA 2024: 0/25 OA 2025: 0/123 OA 2026: 14/119 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.46(1) p. 327-336 OA
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
162 patients who received NAC followed by radical resection with curative intent between April 2016 and December 2024 were included.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
NAC followed by radical resection with curative intent between April 2016 and December 2024 were included
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] Patients with a good response to NAC tended to have a better prognosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy might improve outcomes in patients with poor response to NAC.

Noda K, Tominaga T, Hashimoto S, Yamashita M, Maruta H, Tei S

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND/AIM] Few studies have examined how the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced colorectal cancer affects prognosis.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 43
  • 추적기간 41 months

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Noda K, Tominaga T, et al. (2026). Effect of Pathological Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Long-term Outcomes in Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Japanese Multicenter Study.. Anticancer research, 46(1), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17947
MLA Noda K, et al.. "Effect of Pathological Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Long-term Outcomes in Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Japanese Multicenter Study.." Anticancer research, vol. 46, no. 1, 2026, pp. 327-336.
PMID 41469091 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND/AIM] Few studies have examined how the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced colorectal cancer affects prognosis.

[PATIENTS AND METHODS] A total of 162 patients who received NAC followed by radical resection with curative intent between April 2016 and December 2024 were included. Patients were classified into two groups: good response (n=43) and poor response (n=119). Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis were compared between the groups.

[RESULTS] The good response group had a lower rate of combined resection of adjacent organs (11.6% 25.2%, =0.046), higher clinical N status before NAC (93.0% 71.4%, =0.002), lower pathological T4 rate (2.3% 23.5%, <0.001), and less lymphovascular invasion (30.2% 68.9%, <0.001). Median follow-up duration was 41 months (range=1-66 months). Good responders tended to have better relapse-free survival (RFS; 83.7% 70.5%; =0.092). Overall survival was similar between the groups (88.6% 78.6% =0.629). In the poor response group, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly better RFS than those who did not (67.3% 70.1%, <0.05).

[CONCLUSION] Patients with a good response to NAC tended to have a better prognosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy might improve outcomes in patients with poor response to NAC.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🔓 OA PDF 열기