Immune checkpoint inhibitors after liver transplantation: The role of immunosuppressive management.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
7 patients (13%) and was moderate/severe, developing at a median of 27 (IQR, 23-57) days post-ICI.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
at least one ICI (anti-programmed cell death 1, anti-programmed cell death ligand 1, or anti-cytotoxic T cell-associated protein 4) post-LT
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Rejection post-ICI occurs less frequently than previously reported, but early after therapy initiation, it is severe and linked to the absence of calcineurin inhibitors. Optimizing immunosuppression may enhance the safety of ICI use in transplant recipients.
The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial due to rejection risk.
- p-value P = .04
- p-value P = .013
APA
De Martin E, Antonini TM, et al. (2026). Immune checkpoint inhibitors after liver transplantation: The role of immunosuppressive management.. American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2026.02.010
MLA
De Martin E, et al.. "Immune checkpoint inhibitors after liver transplantation: The role of immunosuppressive management.." American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2026.
PMID
41720193
Abstract
The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial due to rejection risk. This study aims to characterize patients receiving ICIs post-LT and identify the risk factors for rejection. This retrospective, multicenter study included patients who received at least one ICI (anti-programmed cell death 1, anti-programmed cell death ligand 1, or anti-cytotoxic T cell-associated protein 4) post-LT. Fifty-two patients were included (77% male), median age 66 (interquartile range [IQR], 57.5-69.7) years at ICI initiation. The median interval between LT and ICI was 4.5 (IQR, 2.6-9.9) years. ICIs were administered for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence (62%) or de novo cancer (38%), with similar rejection and survival rates. Rejection occurred in 7 patients (13%) and was moderate/severe, developing at a median of 27 (IQR, 23-57) days post-ICI. The increase of immunosuppression and calcineurin inhibitor use at ICI initiation was associated with reduced rejection risk (P = .04 and P = .013, respectively). Rejection was associated with significantly lower survival (P = .0003). Overall survival following the introduction of ICI at 3, 6, and 12 months was 65%, 46.9%, and 38.9%, respectively. Rejection post-ICI occurs less frequently than previously reported, but early after therapy initiation, it is severe and linked to the absence of calcineurin inhibitors. Optimizing immunosuppression may enhance the safety of ICI use in transplant recipients.