본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Comparative Efficacy of Initial Treatment Strategies in Patients with Transarterial Chemoembolisation-Unsuitable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

1/5 보강
Liver cancer 📖 저널 OA 100% 2025: 58/58 OA 2026: 24/24 OA 2025~2026 2026
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
150 patients with TACE-unsuitable HCC, defined according to Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert criteria.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] In TACE-unsuitable patients, systemic treatment with atezolizumab/bevacizumab and, to a lesser extent, lenvatinib is associated with improved outcome compared to TACE. These findings support a paradigm shift in the initial management of intermediate-stage HCC, favouring the early use of systemic therapy in appropriately selected patients.

Giannini EG, Pasta A, Pieri G, Labanca S, Marenco S, Strazzabosco M, Bouattour M, Hollande C, Facciorusso A, Gallo P, Celsa C, Sangiovanni A, Stefanini B, Campani C, Missale G, Vidili G, Ghittoni G, Pinto E, Foschi FG, Morisco F, Zaccherini G, Svegliati-Baroni G, Azzaroli F, Saitta C, Brunetto MR, Sacco R, Ponziani FR, Boninsegna S, Nardone G, Martini A, Mega A, Sacerdoti D, Magalotti D, Di Marco M, Vitale A, Bucci L, Trevisani F

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[INTRODUCTION] Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is considered the standard-of-care for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), despite several patients exhibit features

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 0.35-1.08
  • HR 0.62

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Giannini EG, Pasta A, et al. (2026). Comparative Efficacy of Initial Treatment Strategies in Patients with Transarterial Chemoembolisation-Unsuitable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.. Liver cancer. https://doi.org/10.1159/000551050
MLA Giannini EG, et al.. "Comparative Efficacy of Initial Treatment Strategies in Patients with Transarterial Chemoembolisation-Unsuitable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.." Liver cancer, 2026.
PMID 42016825 ↗
DOI 10.1159/000551050

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is considered the standard-of-care for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), despite several patients exhibit features that may be associated with suboptimal outcome of treatment - also referred to as TACE-unsuitable. In this study, our aim was to provide real-world evidence that patients who are considered TACE-unsuitable may receive greater benefit by systemic therapy than by TACE.

[METHODS] This study analysed 1,150 patients with TACE-unsuitable HCC, defined according to Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert criteria. Patients were initially treated with TACE ( = 842), sorafenib ( = 96), lenvatinib ( = 62), or atezolizumab/bevacizumab ( = 47). Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to adjust for baseline differences.

[RESULTS] Compared to TACE, atezolizumab/bevacizumab reduced mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.27-0.80; = 0.008), lenvatinib was neutral (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.35-1.08; = 0.091), and sorafenib was associated with increased mortality (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.28-2.65; = 0.001). OS at 24 months was 60.2% for TACE, 31.9% for sorafenib, 68.3% for lenvatinib, and 70.5% for atezolizumab/bevacizumab ( < 0.0001). The disease control rate was 53.2% with TACE, 47.9% with sorafenib, 67.8% with lenvatinib ( = 0.030 versus TACE; = 0.025 versus sorafenib), and 75.6% with atezolizumab/bevacizumab ( < 0.001 versus TACE; < 0.001 versus sorafenib).

[CONCLUSIONS] In TACE-unsuitable patients, systemic treatment with atezolizumab/bevacizumab and, to a lesser extent, lenvatinib is associated with improved outcome compared to TACE. These findings support a paradigm shift in the initial management of intermediate-stage HCC, favouring the early use of systemic therapy in appropriately selected patients.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기