Comparative Efficacy of Initial Treatment Strategies in Patients with Transarterial Chemoembolisation-Unsuitable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
150 patients with TACE-unsuitable HCC, defined according to Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert criteria.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] In TACE-unsuitable patients, systemic treatment with atezolizumab/bevacizumab and, to a lesser extent, lenvatinib is associated with improved outcome compared to TACE. These findings support a paradigm shift in the initial management of intermediate-stage HCC, favouring the early use of systemic therapy in appropriately selected patients.
[INTRODUCTION] Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is considered the standard-of-care for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), despite several patients exhibit features
- 95% CI 0.35-1.08
- HR 0.62
APA
Giannini EG, Pasta A, et al. (2026). Comparative Efficacy of Initial Treatment Strategies in Patients with Transarterial Chemoembolisation-Unsuitable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.. Liver cancer. https://doi.org/10.1159/000551050
MLA
Giannini EG, et al.. "Comparative Efficacy of Initial Treatment Strategies in Patients with Transarterial Chemoembolisation-Unsuitable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.." Liver cancer, 2026.
PMID
42016825 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[INTRODUCTION] Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is considered the standard-of-care for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), despite several patients exhibit features that may be associated with suboptimal outcome of treatment - also referred to as TACE-unsuitable. In this study, our aim was to provide real-world evidence that patients who are considered TACE-unsuitable may receive greater benefit by systemic therapy than by TACE.
[METHODS] This study analysed 1,150 patients with TACE-unsuitable HCC, defined according to Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert criteria. Patients were initially treated with TACE ( = 842), sorafenib ( = 96), lenvatinib ( = 62), or atezolizumab/bevacizumab ( = 47). Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to adjust for baseline differences.
[RESULTS] Compared to TACE, atezolizumab/bevacizumab reduced mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.27-0.80; = 0.008), lenvatinib was neutral (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.35-1.08; = 0.091), and sorafenib was associated with increased mortality (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.28-2.65; = 0.001). OS at 24 months was 60.2% for TACE, 31.9% for sorafenib, 68.3% for lenvatinib, and 70.5% for atezolizumab/bevacizumab ( < 0.0001). The disease control rate was 53.2% with TACE, 47.9% with sorafenib, 67.8% with lenvatinib ( = 0.030 versus TACE; = 0.025 versus sorafenib), and 75.6% with atezolizumab/bevacizumab ( < 0.001 versus TACE; < 0.001 versus sorafenib).
[CONCLUSIONS] In TACE-unsuitable patients, systemic treatment with atezolizumab/bevacizumab and, to a lesser extent, lenvatinib is associated with improved outcome compared to TACE. These findings support a paradigm shift in the initial management of intermediate-stage HCC, favouring the early use of systemic therapy in appropriately selected patients.
[METHODS] This study analysed 1,150 patients with TACE-unsuitable HCC, defined according to Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert criteria. Patients were initially treated with TACE ( = 842), sorafenib ( = 96), lenvatinib ( = 62), or atezolizumab/bevacizumab ( = 47). Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to adjust for baseline differences.
[RESULTS] Compared to TACE, atezolizumab/bevacizumab reduced mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.27-0.80; = 0.008), lenvatinib was neutral (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.35-1.08; = 0.091), and sorafenib was associated with increased mortality (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.28-2.65; = 0.001). OS at 24 months was 60.2% for TACE, 31.9% for sorafenib, 68.3% for lenvatinib, and 70.5% for atezolizumab/bevacizumab ( < 0.0001). The disease control rate was 53.2% with TACE, 47.9% with sorafenib, 67.8% with lenvatinib ( = 0.030 versus TACE; = 0.025 versus sorafenib), and 75.6% with atezolizumab/bevacizumab ( < 0.001 versus TACE; < 0.001 versus sorafenib).
[CONCLUSIONS] In TACE-unsuitable patients, systemic treatment with atezolizumab/bevacizumab and, to a lesser extent, lenvatinib is associated with improved outcome compared to TACE. These findings support a paradigm shift in the initial management of intermediate-stage HCC, favouring the early use of systemic therapy in appropriately selected patients.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)
- Sustained Virologic Response and Prognosis in Hepatitis C Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Lessons from Complementary Cohorts.
- Recurrence rate, features, and outcome after hepatocellular carcinoma curative resection or ablation according to the IMbrave050 criteria: a real-world study.
- From hierarchy to conversion: A watermill approach to the therapeutic management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Impact of Comorbidities on Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life of Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative (HR+/HER2-) Advanced Breast Cancer Treated With Palbociclib in the POLARIS Study.
- Associations Between Sex, Disease Features and Outcome in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Sex-Stratified Analysis of the GIMEMA AML1310 Trial.
- Effective use of PROs for survival prediction: Transformer-based modelling in NSCLC patients.
- Balancing safety and efficacy of Bendamustine plus anti CD20 regimens in elderly patients (> 70 y) with follicular lymphoma: a tertiary academic center experience.
- Lateral Tension Upper Body Lift: "Zip-Shark" Technique as Novel Procedure.
- Impact of prior endoscopic or surgical interventions on clinical outcomes after peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia.