본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

GAFAD: An LC-MS/MS-Based Model for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Beyond GALAD's Limitation.

Clinical and molecular hepatology 2026

Kim H, Oh W, Park J, Lee S, Yang WS, Kim SS, Cheong JY, Baek JH

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND/AIMS] The GALAD (Gender, Age, Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive alpha-fetoprotein [AFP-L3], alpha-fetoprotein [AFP], and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin [DCP]) score, widely used for hepatocell

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 235
  • p-value p<0.0001
  • p-value p<0.05
  • Sensitivity 82%

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Kim H, Oh W, et al. (2026). GAFAD: An LC-MS/MS-Based Model for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Beyond GALAD's Limitation.. Clinical and molecular hepatology. https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2025.1244
MLA Kim H, et al.. "GAFAD: An LC-MS/MS-Based Model for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Beyond GALAD's Limitation.." Clinical and molecular hepatology, 2026.
PMID 41740588

Abstract

[BACKGROUND/AIMS] The GALAD (Gender, Age, Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive alpha-fetoprotein [AFP-L3], alpha-fetoprotein [AFP], and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin [DCP]) score, widely used for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection, was primarily derived from cohorts with advanced-stage tumors and elevated biomarker levels, potentially overestimating accuracy in early-stage disease. Furthemore, the lectin-based AFP-L3 assay has poor sensitivity at low AFP concentrations, limiting detection of small or AFP-negative tumors.

[METHODS] We developed GAFAD, a multivariable model replacing AFP-L3 with fucosylated AFP percentage (AFP-Fuc%), quantified by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay. The model was trained and tested using a hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cohort (HCC n=235; non-HCC n=290), a diagnostically challenging set with substantial overlap in biomarker levels between HCC and non-HCC. Moreover, a final model (GAFAD) was validated in two independent cohorts (HCC n=210, non-HCC n=245), comprising HBV-, HCV-related and non-viral etiologies.

[RESULTS] In the development cohort, GAFAD showed superior diagnostic performance to GALAD for distinguishing HCC from non-HCC, with a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC, 0.938 vs. 0.887; p<0.0001) and greater sensitivity (82% vs. 66%) and accuracy (86% vs. 79%) at 90% specificity. In the external validation cohort, GAFAD similarly outperformed GALAD, achieving a higher AUC (0.874 vs. 0.841, p<0.05), greater sensitivity (72% vs. 57%), and improved accuracy (82% vs. 75%) at 90% specificity. This superiority extended to early-stage, very-early-stage, and AFP-negative HCC.

[CONCLUSIONS] GAFAD provides a reliable and generalizable tool for early HCC detection across diverse etiologies, supporting its clinical applicability in surveillance and diagnosis.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)