본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Geographic and Demographic Disparities in Receipt of Treatment for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.

Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center 2026 Vol.33() p. 10732748261433621

Tsai MH, Coughlin SS, Cortes J

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

PurposeTo examine disparities in receipt of the first course of treatment modality used among individuals diagnosed with early-onset colorectal cancer, focusing on sex, race/ethnicity, and rurality di

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p=0.097
  • p-value p<0.001
  • 95% CI 0.60-0.95
  • 연구 설계 cross-sectional

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Tsai MH, Coughlin SS, Cortes J (2026). Geographic and Demographic Disparities in Receipt of Treatment for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.. Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center, 33, 10732748261433621. https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748261433621
MLA Tsai MH, et al.. "Geographic and Demographic Disparities in Receipt of Treatment for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.." Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center, vol. 33, 2026, pp. 10732748261433621.
PMID 41986992

Abstract

PurposeTo examine disparities in receipt of the first course of treatment modality used among individuals diagnosed with early-onset colorectal cancer, focusing on sex, race/ethnicity, and rurality differences.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis utilizing national data from the 2006-2020 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program among adults aged 20-49. Key factors included sex, race/ethnicity, and rurality. Our main outcomes were whether patients started treatment, and which types they received. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed.ResultsOf total 82,427 patients, males (54.9%, p=0.097), racial minorities (0.8%-23.3%, p<0.001), and patients in all urban areas (70.7%; p<0.001) had higher rates of no treatment. Adjusted analysis showed that male patients had16%-19% lower odds of receiving surgery regardless of rurality (p<0.05) compared with female patients. In all/mostly urban areas, Black patients were found to had 17%-41% lower odds of receiving any treatment modalities (p<0.05); Hispanic patients had 11%-24% lower odds of receiving any treatment modalities (mostly urban: OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95) or surgery alone (all urban: OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.95) compared with White patients. In rural areas, 33% and 34% lower odds of receiving radiation treatment were found among American Indian (AI)/Alaska Native (AN) (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.98) and Asian/Pacific Islander (PI) patients (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.99) compared with White patients, respectively.ConclusionsDisparities in receipt of surgery treatment were observed in males regardless of rurality. Black and Hispanic patients in urban areas had lower treatment use, while AI/AN and Asian/PI patients in rural areas were less likely to start radiation. Targeted approaches for specific groups are needed.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Male; Female; Colorectal Neoplasms; Healthcare Disparities; Adult; Middle Aged; Cross-Sectional Studies; SEER Program; Young Adult; Rural Population; United States; Urban Population; Age of Onset; Ethnicity

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)