Community-Based Recommendations to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening: Utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Patient and Provider Perceptions - A Mixed Methods Study in North Dakota.
PurposeThis study examines community and provider perceptions of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using the (TPB) to identify barriers and interventions for improving screening rates.Approach or Des
- 표본수 (n) 183
APA
Ryan C, Schroeder S, Ganai S (2026). Community-Based Recommendations to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening: Utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Patient and Provider Perceptions - A Mixed Methods Study in North Dakota.. American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 8901171261417439. https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171261417439
MLA
Ryan C, et al.. "Community-Based Recommendations to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening: Utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Patient and Provider Perceptions - A Mixed Methods Study in North Dakota.." American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 2026, pp. 8901171261417439.
PMID
41526327
Abstract
PurposeThis study examines community and provider perceptions of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using the (TPB) to identify barriers and interventions for improving screening rates.Approach or DesignA mixed methods research design using focus groups with community members and semi-structured interviews with health care providers in counties with the highest and lowest CRC mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs). Data analysis was guided by the TPB.SettingNorth Dakota counties with the highest and lowest CRC MIRs, covering urban and rural populations.ParticipantsTwenty community members aged 50+ (18 women, 2 men) participated in 5 in-person and 3 virtual focus groups. Eight health care providers, including physicians and nurse practitioners, were interviewed virtually.MethodFocus groups and interviews were conducted between summer and fall 2023. Discussions were transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed using Dedoose, guided by the TPB.ResultsTop barriers included access to screening (total codes, n = 183), fear/stigma (n = 126), provider communication (n = 80), cost (n = 67), and travel (n = 58). Community members relied on social networks over providers for screening decisions. No significant differences emerged between high- and low-MIR counties, nor between rural and urban, indicating systemic rather than geographic barriers.ConclusionFindings suggest improving provider communication, leveraging trusted social networks, addressing stigma, and reducing barriers to screening (eg, cost, transportation). Future interventions should prioritize community-informed health promotion efforts to increase CRC screening rates and improve health equity.