Relationships among social support, decision self-efficacy, and decision regret in colorectal chemotherapy cancer patients: A mediating model.
[OBJECTIVE] This study aims to identify the factors associated with decision regret among colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in China and to determine whether decision self-efficacy me
- p-value p < 0.001
- 연구 설계 cross-sectional
APA
Duan Z, Li Y, et al. (2026). Relationships among social support, decision self-efficacy, and decision regret in colorectal chemotherapy cancer patients: A mediating model.. PloS one, 21(1), e0339927. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339927
MLA
Duan Z, et al.. "Relationships among social support, decision self-efficacy, and decision regret in colorectal chemotherapy cancer patients: A mediating model.." PloS one, vol. 21, no. 1, 2026, pp. e0339927.
PMID
41544062
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] This study aims to identify the factors associated with decision regret among colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in China and to determine whether decision self-efficacy mediates the relationship between social support and decision regret.
[METHODS] A cross-sectional study was conducted using convenience sampling with 243 colorectal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. From 29 July 2025-2 October 2025., all participants were recruited from a tertiary hospital in Inner Mongolia, China. Data were collected through a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire, the Social Support Scale, the Decision Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Three-Dimensional Decision Regret Scale. Non-parametric tests were employed to analyze associated factors, and mediation analysis was performed using SPSS and AMOS.
[RESULTS] Educational attainment, occupational status, and monthly income were significantly associated with decision regret among patients. Further analysis revealed a negative association between social support and decision regret in individuals undergoing chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (β = -0.306, p < 0.001). Path estimates showed that social support was positively associated with decision self-efficacy (β = 0.471, p < 0.001), while decision self-efficacy was negatively associated with decision regret (β = -0.581, p < 0.001). Decision self-efficacy functioned as a mediator linking social support to decision regret, producing an indirect effect of -0.273, which accounted for 47.24% of the total effect.
[CONCLUSION] Notable interactions were observed among social support, decision self-efficacy, and decision regret, with decision self-efficacy serving as the mediating mechanism. Clinicians are encouraged to prioritize strengthening both external social support and patients' internal decision self-efficacy, which were associated with lower decision regret and better quality of life. Additionally, particular attention should be directed toward individuals with lower income, limited employment, or lower educational attainment, as they demonstrate a heightened vulnerability to experiencing decision regret.
[METHODS] A cross-sectional study was conducted using convenience sampling with 243 colorectal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. From 29 July 2025-2 October 2025., all participants were recruited from a tertiary hospital in Inner Mongolia, China. Data were collected through a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire, the Social Support Scale, the Decision Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Three-Dimensional Decision Regret Scale. Non-parametric tests were employed to analyze associated factors, and mediation analysis was performed using SPSS and AMOS.
[RESULTS] Educational attainment, occupational status, and monthly income were significantly associated with decision regret among patients. Further analysis revealed a negative association between social support and decision regret in individuals undergoing chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (β = -0.306, p < 0.001). Path estimates showed that social support was positively associated with decision self-efficacy (β = 0.471, p < 0.001), while decision self-efficacy was negatively associated with decision regret (β = -0.581, p < 0.001). Decision self-efficacy functioned as a mediator linking social support to decision regret, producing an indirect effect of -0.273, which accounted for 47.24% of the total effect.
[CONCLUSION] Notable interactions were observed among social support, decision self-efficacy, and decision regret, with decision self-efficacy serving as the mediating mechanism. Clinicians are encouraged to prioritize strengthening both external social support and patients' internal decision self-efficacy, which were associated with lower decision regret and better quality of life. Additionally, particular attention should be directed toward individuals with lower income, limited employment, or lower educational attainment, as they demonstrate a heightened vulnerability to experiencing decision regret.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Male; Self Efficacy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Social Support; Middle Aged; Cross-Sectional Studies; Emotions; Decision Making; Aged; China; Adult; Surveys and Questionnaires
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based model for predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
- Identification and experimental validation of core genes associated with breast cancer brain metastasis via machine learning.
- Correction: PDZK1 inhibits MRP2-mediated oxaliplatin chemosensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma.
- Multi-center benchmarking of large language models for clinical decision support in lung cancer screening.
- PROX1 is an early driver of lineage plasticity in prostate cancer.