본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A Narrative Review of the Therapeutic Effectiveness of Lenvatinib in Comparison With Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Non-Viral Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Cureus 2026 Vol.18(3) p. e105157

Sonone P, Goyal S, Lokeshwar N, Dharmadhikari S, Puppalwar G, Khandhedia C, Mane A, Mehta S

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

The therapeutic landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) has evolved with the advent of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Sonone P, Goyal S, et al. (2026). A Narrative Review of the Therapeutic Effectiveness of Lenvatinib in Comparison With Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Non-Viral Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.. Cureus, 18(3), e105157. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.105157
MLA Sonone P, et al.. "A Narrative Review of the Therapeutic Effectiveness of Lenvatinib in Comparison With Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Non-Viral Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.." Cureus, vol. 18, no. 3, 2026, pp. e105157.
PMID 41994681

Abstract

The therapeutic landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) has evolved with the advent of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). While ICI-based regimens such as atezolizumab and bevacizumab are widely adopted as first-line therapy, emerging evidence indicates reduced effectiveness in patients with non-viral etiologies such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and steatotic liver disease (MASLD). With viral HCC declining and non-viral cases increasing, lenvatinib, a potent multi-kinase inhibitor, has gained attention for its favorable efficacy in this subgroup. A thorough literature search was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Science Direct, for English-language studies published from 2014 to 2025. Relevant randomized controlled trials, observational studies, real-world evidence, and registered clinical trials were reviewed. Our review indicates that lenvatinib may outperform ICI-based regimens in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with non-viral aHCC, particularly those with MASLD/MASH; however, this observation is based predominantly on retrospective studies. Its mechanisms, including angiogenesis inhibition and immune modulation, offer advantages in the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of non-viral HCC. Safety data suggest a manageable profile, with adverse events comparable to those in viral HCC. Emerging data also support lenvatinib-based combination therapies to enhance efficacy. Moreover, we have also discussed the existing challenges in managing HCC in clinical practice. Lenvatinib is a promising first-line option in non-viral aHCC in patients with MASH or MASLD. Given the etiology-specific response to therapy, future research and clinical guidelines should consider stratified approaches. Evidence suggests superior survival outcomes compared with ICIs. Etiology-specific responses highlight the need for stratified therapeutic approaches and consideration of lenvatinib-based combination therapies.