본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

The role of vitamin K in the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
Frontiers in oncology 📖 저널 OA 100% 2021: 15/15 OA 2022: 98/98 OA 2023: 60/60 OA 2024: 189/189 OA 2025: 1004/1004 OA 2026: 620/620 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.16() p. 1765445
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
688 subjects were incorporated.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Future investigations should optimize VK dosing and administration strategies and explore its potential synergy with immunotherapy. [SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION] https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251106693, identifier CRD420251106693.

Guo L, Wang Y, Tan Z, Lu T, Peng Z, Huang H

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the influence of vitamin K (VK) as an adjunctive therapy on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a specific focus on its

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 0.58-1.01
  • HR 0.77
  • 연구 설계 meta-analysis

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Guo L, Wang Y, et al. (2026). The role of vitamin K in the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Frontiers in oncology, 16, 1765445. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1765445
MLA Guo L, et al.. "The role of vitamin K in the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.." Frontiers in oncology, vol. 16, 2026, pp. 1765445.
PMID 41930200 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the influence of vitamin K (VK) as an adjunctive therapy on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a specific focus on its clinical value in non-resected individuals.

[METHODS] We systematically retrieved Chinese and English databases, including PubMed and Embase, to select randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing VK combined with standard therapy versus standard therapy alone. Methodological quality was evaluated via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB-2) for RCTs. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoint was recurrence risk. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) were computed by fixed- or random-effects models. Subgroup analyses (surgery vs. transarterial chemoembolization [TACE]) and time stratification (12-48M) were conducted to explore heterogeneity sources.

[RESULTS] Eleven studies involving 688 subjects were incorporated. The fixed-effects meta-analysis indicated that VK combined with standard therapy did not significantly improve OS (pooled HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.58-1.01). However, this combination prolonged PFS (pooled HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.47-0.82). Subgroup analysis based on PFS demonstrated more pronounced benefit in TACE-treated subjects (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34-0.77). Furthermore, VK combined with standard therapy reduced recurrence risk (pooled HR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.15-0.46).

[CONCLUSION] Adjunctive VK improves PFS and reduces recurrence risk in HCC subjects, demonstrating particular benefit for those with unresectable tumors receiving TACE. No significant OS advantage was observed. Future investigations should optimize VK dosing and administration strategies and explore its potential synergy with immunotherapy.

[SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION] https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251106693, identifier CRD420251106693.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기