본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Key genes and pathway differences between serrated polyps and conventional adenomas: insights from multi-omics.

Translational cancer research 2026 Vol.15(1) p. 35

Zhou Y, Yang C, Gao Y, Ye S, Zhou H, Lin Z, Fu Y, Ning X, Ke C

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] As two major colorectal cancer (CRC) pathways, serrated polyps (SP) and traditional adenomas show distinct cellular and molecular features, yet the key cell types and causal genes driving

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Zhou Y, Yang C, et al. (2026). Key genes and pathway differences between serrated polyps and conventional adenomas: insights from multi-omics.. Translational cancer research, 15(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-2025-2138
MLA Zhou Y, et al.. "Key genes and pathway differences between serrated polyps and conventional adenomas: insights from multi-omics.." Translational cancer research, vol. 15, no. 1, 2026, pp. 35.
PMID 41674976

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] As two major colorectal cancer (CRC) pathways, serrated polyps (SP) and traditional adenomas show distinct cellular and molecular features, yet the key cell types and causal genes driving their malignant progression remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate the pivotal cellular groups and genes in the cancerous transformation of SP and traditional adenomas using multi-omics approach.

[METHODS] scPagwas (pathway-based polygenic regression method) was used to integrate CRC genome-wide association study (GWAS) data with single-cell sequencing in intestinal polyps, identifying cell groups and genes associated with phenotypic traits. Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) analysis and fine-mapping, based on summary-level expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), were utilized to further screen for CRC-associated risk genes. Cell communication and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) determined receptor differences and pathway expression variations between SP and traditional adenomas. Mendelian randomization (MR) and phenome-wide association study analyses were used to investigate the connections between crucial genes and specific phenotypes.

[RESULTS] Serrated-specific cells (SSC) were identified as the epithelial population most strongly associated with CRC genetic risk, whereas adenoma-specific cells (ASC) showed no significant enrichment. Integrating TWAS, fine-mapping, and SMR analyses, we identified six robust risk genes-, , , , , and . SSC and ASC displayed distinct transcriptional programs, with pathway analysis highlighting differences in signaling and oxidative phosphorylation. Notably, and emerged as particularly important genes, as they were consistently identified across scPagwas, TWAS and fine-mapping analyses, exhibited strong and contrasting specificity for SSC cells and ASC cells respectively, and demonstrated clear pathway relevance to serrated and conventional adenoma biology.

[CONCLUSIONS] This multi-omics analysis reveals that the development of sessile serrated adenomas and conventional adenomas (CA) is associated with distinct epithelial origins, with serrated lesions linked to SSC cells and CA linked to ASC cells. These lesion-specific molecular features provide a mechanistic basis for improving preoperative detection and for developing adjunct molecular tools for high-risk polyp assessment.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)