A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve the Accuracy of Follow-Up Surveillance Time Intervals in the Electronic Health Record After a Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.
무작위 임상시험
1/5 보강
[INTRODUCTION] Electronic health records (EHRs) provide cancer screening reminders to patients and clinicians, but they are not always accurate.
- 표본수 (n) 22
- p-value P < 0.001
- 연구 설계 randomized controlled trial
APA
Atlas SJ, Palchaudhuri S, et al. (2026). A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve the Accuracy of Follow-Up Surveillance Time Intervals in the Electronic Health Record After a Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.. The American journal of gastroenterology, 121(2), 432-440. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003497
MLA
Atlas SJ, et al.. "A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve the Accuracy of Follow-Up Surveillance Time Intervals in the Electronic Health Record After a Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.." The American journal of gastroenterology, vol. 121, no. 2, 2026, pp. 432-440.
PMID
40267265 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[INTRODUCTION] Electronic health records (EHRs) provide cancer screening reminders to patients and clinicians, but they are not always accurate. Updating the EHR after a colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening is typically performed manually by the endoscopist when pathology results are available but may be error prone. We evaluated an electronic tool embedded in patient result letters that automatically updated the EHR follow-up time interval after a colonoscopy.
[METHODS] A randomized controlled trial of endoscopists from 1 institution who performed colonoscopies on patients undergoing a screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Intervention endoscopists were trained to use the electronic tool in their result letters to patients. Control endoscopists continued with their usual care. The primary outcome was the accuracy of the follow-up surveillance colonoscopy time interval in the EHR compared with the time interval specified in the patient result letter.
[RESULTS] Overall, 43 endoscopists were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 22) or control (n = 21) groups. Characteristics of patients in the intervention (n = 2,365) and control (n = 1,422) were similar. A result letter was sent to 1,498 (63.3%) intervention and 814 (57.2%) control patients ( P < 0.001). Among all patients sent a result letter, the accuracy of the follow-up colonoscopy surveillance time interval between the result letter and the EHR was significantly higher for the intervention (92.4% vs 76.2%, P < 0.001). Intervention endoscopists were more satisfied with the process of reporting results after a colonoscopy (88.2% vs 60.0%, P = 0.11).
[DISCUSSION] For patients undergoing a colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening, an electronic tool embedded in the result letter that automatically updated the EHR significantly improved the accuracy of the follow-up time interval compared with usual care.
[METHODS] A randomized controlled trial of endoscopists from 1 institution who performed colonoscopies on patients undergoing a screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Intervention endoscopists were trained to use the electronic tool in their result letters to patients. Control endoscopists continued with their usual care. The primary outcome was the accuracy of the follow-up surveillance colonoscopy time interval in the EHR compared with the time interval specified in the patient result letter.
[RESULTS] Overall, 43 endoscopists were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 22) or control (n = 21) groups. Characteristics of patients in the intervention (n = 2,365) and control (n = 1,422) were similar. A result letter was sent to 1,498 (63.3%) intervention and 814 (57.2%) control patients ( P < 0.001). Among all patients sent a result letter, the accuracy of the follow-up colonoscopy surveillance time interval between the result letter and the EHR was significantly higher for the intervention (92.4% vs 76.2%, P < 0.001). Intervention endoscopists were more satisfied with the process of reporting results after a colonoscopy (88.2% vs 60.0%, P = 0.11).
[DISCUSSION] For patients undergoing a colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening, an electronic tool embedded in the result letter that automatically updated the EHR significantly improved the accuracy of the follow-up time interval compared with usual care.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.