A multicenter trial evaluating the short-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic colectomy for overweight and obese patients with colon cancer: a secondary analysis of the ICAN study.
[PURPOSE] The safety and benefits of intracorporeal anastomosis (ICAN) in overweight and obese colon cancer patients remain unclear.
- 표본수 (n) 191
- p-value p < 0.001
- 연구 설계 cohort study
APA
Ota E, Watanabe J, et al. (2026). A multicenter trial evaluating the short-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic colectomy for overweight and obese patients with colon cancer: a secondary analysis of the ICAN study.. Surgery today, 56(2), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03117-8
MLA
Ota E, et al.. "A multicenter trial evaluating the short-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic colectomy for overweight and obese patients with colon cancer: a secondary analysis of the ICAN study.." Surgery today, vol. 56, no. 2, 2026, pp. 123-132.
PMID
40841446
Abstract
[PURPOSE] The safety and benefits of intracorporeal anastomosis (ICAN) in overweight and obese colon cancer patients remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of ICAN compared to extracorporeal anastomosis (ECAN) in this population.
[METHODS] This nationwide multicenter retrospective cohort study included 46 institutions. Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m in patients with clinical stage 0-III colon adenocarcinoma who underwent laparoscopic colectomy were assessed using propensity score matching to compare ICAN and ECAN.
[RESULTS] Between January 2020 and December 2021, 361 patients were analyzed (ICAN, n = 191; ECAN, n = 170). ICAN was associated with a longer operative time (252 vs. 232 min, p < 0.001), but significantly less blood loss (5 vs. 15.5 ml, p < 0.001) and a shorter wound length (4 vs. 5 cm, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the intraoperative (1.6 vs. 1.8%) or postoperative complication rates (9.4 vs. 7.6%). The time to first stool passage was shorter in the ICAN group (3 (IQR 2-4) vs. 3 (IQR 3-5) days, p < 0.001).
[CONCLUSIONS] ICAN is safe and beneficial for overweight and obese patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy, offering reduced blood loss, smaller incisions, and a faster bowel recovery.
[TRIAL REGISTRATION] This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry System in 2022 (UMIN000047994).
[METHODS] This nationwide multicenter retrospective cohort study included 46 institutions. Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m in patients with clinical stage 0-III colon adenocarcinoma who underwent laparoscopic colectomy were assessed using propensity score matching to compare ICAN and ECAN.
[RESULTS] Between January 2020 and December 2021, 361 patients were analyzed (ICAN, n = 191; ECAN, n = 170). ICAN was associated with a longer operative time (252 vs. 232 min, p < 0.001), but significantly less blood loss (5 vs. 15.5 ml, p < 0.001) and a shorter wound length (4 vs. 5 cm, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the intraoperative (1.6 vs. 1.8%) or postoperative complication rates (9.4 vs. 7.6%). The time to first stool passage was shorter in the ICAN group (3 (IQR 2-4) vs. 3 (IQR 3-5) days, p < 0.001).
[CONCLUSIONS] ICAN is safe and beneficial for overweight and obese patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy, offering reduced blood loss, smaller incisions, and a faster bowel recovery.
[TRIAL REGISTRATION] This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry System in 2022 (UMIN000047994).
MeSH Terms
Humans; Colectomy; Laparoscopy; Colonic Neoplasms; Male; Female; Obesity; Anastomosis, Surgical; Aged; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Overweight; Operative Time; Time Factors; Postoperative Complications; Blood Loss, Surgical; Adenocarcinoma; Body Mass Index; Cohort Studies