본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Diagnosing HCC with conventional and late portal venous phase MRI: intraindividual comparison of MRI with extracellular contrast agent.

1/5 보강
European radiology 📖 저널 OA 29.4% 2022: 1/4 OA 2023: 0/7 OA 2024: 2/11 OA 2025: 18/71 OA 2026: 57/165 OA 2022~2026 2026 Vol.36(4) p. 2903-2911
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
추출되지 않음
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
both ECA-MRI and EOB-MRI using CPVP and LPVP
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Findings EOB-MRI using LPVP improved the sensitivity of HCC diagnoses compared with ECA-MRI and EOB-MRI using conventional portal venous phase, without compromising specificity. Clinical relevance EOB-MRI using LPVP may be a suitable option for HCC diagnosis, demonstrating higher sensitivity than ECA-MRI without compromising specificity.

Jeong B, Han DH, Lee S, Yoon JK, Choi JY, Choi GH, Kim DY, Kim MJ

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVES] To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI with gadoxetate disodium (EOB-MRI) using conventional portal venous phase (CPVP) and late portal venous phase (LPVP) in the noninvasive diagn

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.02

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Jeong B, Han DH, et al. (2026). Diagnosing HCC with conventional and late portal venous phase MRI: intraindividual comparison of MRI with extracellular contrast agent.. European radiology, 36(4), 2903-2911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12082-2
MLA Jeong B, et al.. "Diagnosing HCC with conventional and late portal venous phase MRI: intraindividual comparison of MRI with extracellular contrast agent.." European radiology, vol. 36, no. 4, 2026, pp. 2903-2911.
PMID 41136757 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVES] To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI with gadoxetate disodium (EOB-MRI) using conventional portal venous phase (CPVP) and late portal venous phase (LPVP) in the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with intraindividual comparison of MRI with extracellular contrast agent (ECA-MRI).

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] This retrospective study included 107 prospectively enrolled at-risk patients (mean age, 59.4 years; 89 men) with 143 lesions (118 HCCs) who underwent both ECA-MRI and EOB-MRI using CPVP and LPVP. Two radiologists assessed all lesions using LI-RADS v2018. The per-lesion diagnostic performance was compared using generalized estimating equations.

[RESULTS] In HCCs, nonperipheral washout appearance was less frequent on EOB-MRI using CPVP than on ECA-MRI (R1: 69.5 vs. 79.7%, p = 0.02; R2: 66.9 vs. 76.3%, p = 0.02), but more frequent on EOB-MRI using LPVP than on ECA-MRI (R1: 94.1 vs. 79.7%, p < 0.001; R2: 92.4 vs. 76.3%, p < 0.001). For LR-5, EOB-MRI using LPVP showed significantly higher sensitivity for diagnosing HCC than ECA-MRI (R1, 80.5 vs. 72.0%, p = 0.03; R2: 79.7 vs. 71.2%, p = 0.01), while EOB-MRI using CPVP showed significantly lower sensitivity than ECA-MRI (R1: 64.4 vs. 72.0%, p = 0.03; R2: 64.4 vs. 71.2%, p = 0.03). The specificity of EOB-MRI using LPVP (both Readers: 88.0%) did not differ significantly from that of ECA-MRI (both Readers: 92.0%, p = 0.31) or EOB-MRI using CPVP (both Readers: 92.0%, p = 0.31).

[CONCLUSIONS] EOB-MRI using LPVP demonstrated higher sensitivity for HCC diagnosis than ECA-MRI and EOB-MRI using CPVP, while maintaining comparable specificity.

[KEY POINTS] Question MRI with gadoxetate disodium (EOB-MRI) using the late portal venous phase (LPVP) for HCC diagnosis has not been directly compared with MRI with extracellular contrast agent (ECA-MRI). Findings EOB-MRI using LPVP improved the sensitivity of HCC diagnoses compared with ECA-MRI and EOB-MRI using conventional portal venous phase, without compromising specificity. Clinical relevance EOB-MRI using LPVP may be a suitable option for HCC diagnosis, demonstrating higher sensitivity than ECA-MRI without compromising specificity.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반