본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Enhanced adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: a GRADE assessed systematic review and meta-analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
Clinical endoscopy 📖 저널 OA 70% 2024: 2/2 OA 2025: 11/16 OA 2026: 7/11 OA 2024~2026 2026
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
702 participants) were included.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
EV use was associated with more AEs. [CONCLUSIONS] EV-assisted colonoscopy improved ADRs and PDRs in both colonic regions and enhanced CRC screening despite increased AEs.

Khan AA, Hasan F, Marsool MDM, Uzair M, Maryam KUE, Babar MU, Talha M, Imran H, Bakhsh RMM, Zulfiqar K, Wahid F, Khan AS, Guirguis DA, Tofani C, Infantolino A

ℹ️ 이 논문은 무료 전문이 아직 없습니다. 코퍼스 전체의 43.9%는 무료 가능 (통계 →) · 🏥 기관 EZproxy로 시도

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND/AIMS] Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths and the third most common cancer worldwide.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 1.10-1.23
  • 연구 설계 Meta-Analysis

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Khan AA, Hasan F, et al. (2026). Enhanced adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: a GRADE assessed systematic review and meta-analysis.. Clinical endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2025.163
MLA Khan AA, et al.. "Enhanced adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: a GRADE assessed systematic review and meta-analysis.." Clinical endoscopy, 2026.
PMID 41956736 ↗
DOI 10.5946/ce.2025.163

Abstract

[BACKGROUND/AIMS] Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths and the third most common cancer worldwide. Detecting adenomas during colonoscopy reduces the CRC risk, with higher adenoma detection rates (ADRs) correlating with lower CRC incidence and mortality. Endocuff Vision (EV) enhances mucosal visualization and may improve ADRs.

[METHODS] Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched through April 2025 for studies comparing EV-assisted and standard colonoscopy. The primary outcomes of interest were the ADRs, polyp detection rates (PDRs), and adverse events (AEs). Outcomes were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis model and are presented as risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences. Heterogeneity in the pooled outcomes was assessed using the Higgins I².

[RESULTS] Thirty-four studies (43,702 participants) were included. EV significantly improved ADRs (RR, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI],1.07-1.25) and PDRs (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.23). EV also improved lesion detection in the left colon (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.11-1.35) and right colon (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.09-1.29). No significant improvement was observed in advanced ADRs or cecal intubation. EV use was associated with more AEs.

[CONCLUSIONS] EV-assisted colonoscopy improved ADRs and PDRs in both colonic regions and enhanced CRC screening despite increased AEs.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반