본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A short-term, exploratory randomized controlled trial on the safety and feasibility of intraoperative raltitrexed peritoneal chemotherapy in laparoscopic radical resection for advanced colorectal cancer.

Frontiers in surgery 2026 Vol.13() p. 1545705

Jin H, Yao J, Wei Z, Zhou W, Chen C, Ying R

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) with primary tumor stage T3 or T4 are at increased risk of peritoneal metastasis.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 0.48-3.98
  • 연구 설계 randomized controlled trial

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Jin H, Yao J, et al. (2026). A short-term, exploratory randomized controlled trial on the safety and feasibility of intraoperative raltitrexed peritoneal chemotherapy in laparoscopic radical resection for advanced colorectal cancer.. Frontiers in surgery, 13, 1545705. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1545705
MLA Jin H, et al.. "A short-term, exploratory randomized controlled trial on the safety and feasibility of intraoperative raltitrexed peritoneal chemotherapy in laparoscopic radical resection for advanced colorectal cancer.." Frontiers in surgery, vol. 13, 2026, pp. 1545705.
PMID 41737519

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) with primary tumor stage T3 or T4 are at increased risk of peritoneal metastasis. The safety and feasibility of combining radical resection with intraoperative intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (IPC) using raltitrexed in this population warrant further investigation.

[METHODS] In this single-center, exploratory randomized controlled trial, 60 patients with advanced CRC (T3, T4) scheduled for laparoscopic radical resection were randomly assigned to receive either intraoperative raltitrexed IPC ( = 30) or surgery alone (control,  = 30). The primary endpoints were safety and feasibility. Toxicity profiles (hematologic, renal, hepatic), postoperative complications within 14 days, and procedural feasibility were compared between groups. Short-term tumor marker levels [carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA] and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 [CA19-9]] were assessed as exploratory endpoints, measured preoperatively and at three months postoperatively, with recurrence or metastasis events recorded within the same period.

[RESULTS] The IPC procedure was successfully completed in all assigned patients, confirming procedural feasibility. No significant between-group differences were observed in postoperative hematological toxicity, nephrotoxicity, or complication rates. Transaminase elevations (ALT/AST) on postoperative day seven were transient and mild in both cohorts, with a more marked yet clinically manageable increase in the IPC group. At the three-month follow-up, no significant between-group differences were found in tumor marker levels or recurrence rates. Within-group analyses, however, demonstrated a significant decrease in CEA in the IPC group [mean change: -2.23 ± 4.68 ng/mL (95% CI: 0.48-3.98);  = 0.014] and a significant increase in CA19-9 in the control group [mean change: +3.33 ± 7.07 U/mL (95% CI: 0.69-5.97);  = 0.015].

[CONCLUSIONS] For patients with advanced CRC (T3/T4), laparoscopic radical resection combined with intraoperative raltitrexed IPC is feasible and exhibits an acceptable short-term safety profile. Observed short-term changes in tumor markers are considered exploratory findings and require validation in subsequent, large-scale prospective studies with extended follow-up periods.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)