Cost-effectiveness of the GAAD algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance of patients with compensated cirrhosis: a model-based analysis using Italian real-world data.
2/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: compensated cirrhosis (CC) is critical for improving prognosis
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[LIMITATIONS] Assumptions were required to estimate the diagnostic performance of US+GAAD, given the absence of prospective validation data.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Liver Disease and Transplantation
[AIMS] Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with compensated cirrhosis (CC) is critical for improving prognosis.
APA
Camilla Porta, Lorenzo Pradelli, et al. (2026). Cost-effectiveness of the GAAD algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance of patients with compensated cirrhosis: a model-based analysis using Italian real-world data.. Journal of medical economics, 29(1), 406-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2026.2627833
MLA
Camilla Porta, et al.. "Cost-effectiveness of the GAAD algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance of patients with compensated cirrhosis: a model-based analysis using Italian real-world data.." Journal of medical economics, vol. 29, no. 1, 2026, pp. 406-420.
PMID
41701165
Abstract
[AIMS] Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with compensated cirrhosis (CC) is critical for improving prognosis. The GAAD algorithm (gender [biological sex], age, alpha-fetoprotein [AFP], protein induced by vitamin K absence-II [PIVKA-II]) demonstrated good performance for the detection of early-stage HCC. This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the GAAD algorithm for HCC surveillance in patients with CC in Italy, from the Italian Health Service perspective.
[METHODS] A probabilistic micro-simulation Markov model was adapted to the Italian context to estimate lifetime clinical outcomes and costs of CC patients undergoing bi-annual surveillance with ultrasound (US), US+AFP, GAAD, and US+GAAD. Clinical inputs and utility values were derived from Italian real-world data and published literature. Direct healthcare costs were collected from Italian sources. Costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual 3% rate. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the uncertainties in input parameters.
[RESULTS] In a simulated cohort of 100,000 CC patients, QALYs and costs per patient were 6.53 and €35,524 for US, 6.56 and €35,825 for US+AFP, 6.57 and €35,423 for GAAD, and 6.58 and €35,939 for US+GAAD. Compared to US and US+AFP, GAAD was dominant, while US+GAAD was cost-effective (ICUR of €9,482 and €10,951 per QALY gained, respectively). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000, GAAD was the most cost-effective strategy. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of results.
[LIMITATIONS] Assumptions were required to estimate the diagnostic performance of US+GAAD, given the absence of prospective validation data. Some clinical parameters were derived from non-Italian sources, which may limit generalizability.
[CONCLUSION] GAAD, alone or combined with US, is a cost-effective strategy for HCC surveillance in CC patients in Italy, improving the detection of early-stage disease. Better performance data for US+GAAD is needed to confirm results.
[METHODS] A probabilistic micro-simulation Markov model was adapted to the Italian context to estimate lifetime clinical outcomes and costs of CC patients undergoing bi-annual surveillance with ultrasound (US), US+AFP, GAAD, and US+GAAD. Clinical inputs and utility values were derived from Italian real-world data and published literature. Direct healthcare costs were collected from Italian sources. Costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual 3% rate. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the uncertainties in input parameters.
[RESULTS] In a simulated cohort of 100,000 CC patients, QALYs and costs per patient were 6.53 and €35,524 for US, 6.56 and €35,825 for US+AFP, 6.57 and €35,423 for GAAD, and 6.58 and €35,939 for US+GAAD. Compared to US and US+AFP, GAAD was dominant, while US+GAAD was cost-effective (ICUR of €9,482 and €10,951 per QALY gained, respectively). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000, GAAD was the most cost-effective strategy. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of results.
[LIMITATIONS] Assumptions were required to estimate the diagnostic performance of US+GAAD, given the absence of prospective validation data. Some clinical parameters were derived from non-Italian sources, which may limit generalizability.
[CONCLUSION] GAAD, alone or combined with US, is a cost-effective strategy for HCC surveillance in CC patients in Italy, improving the detection of early-stage disease. Better performance data for US+GAAD is needed to confirm results.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Liver Neoplasms; Italy; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Female; Algorithms; Middle Aged; Markov Chains; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; alpha-Fetoproteins; Early Detection of Cancer; Aged; Ultrasonography; Protein Precursors; Sex Factors; Age Factors; Prothrombin; Biomarkers