본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Clinical implications of computer-aided real-time size estimation of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy: a prospective study.

1/5 보강
Endoscopy 📖 저널 OA 59.7% 2022: 0/1 OA 2023: 2/3 OA 2024: 9/9 OA 2025: 17/24 OA 2026: 9/20 OA 2022~2026 2026 Vol.58(3) p. 290-294
Retraction 확인
출처

Antonelli G, Desideri F, Schiavone S, Bevilacqua N, Dequarti A, Sossi R, Farris P, Iacopini F, Hassan C

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Accurate polyp size estimation during colonoscopy is crucial for clinical decision making, follow-up, and implementation of cost-saving strategies.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 82.5-88.8

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Antonelli G, Desideri F, et al. (2026). Clinical implications of computer-aided real-time size estimation of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy: a prospective study.. Endoscopy, 58(3), 290-294. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2695-1978
MLA Antonelli G, et al.. "Clinical implications of computer-aided real-time size estimation of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy: a prospective study.." Endoscopy, vol. 58, no. 3, 2026, pp. 290-294.
PMID 40902621 ↗
DOI 10.1055/a-2695-1978

Abstract

Accurate polyp size estimation during colonoscopy is crucial for clinical decision making, follow-up, and implementation of cost-saving strategies. Objective sizing methods are lacking, and interobserver variability is high. This prospective, multicenter, study evaluated the accuracy of a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm for polyp size estimation.Patient aged ≥18 years undergoing colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening or surveillance were enrolled across three centers. Polyp size was initially assessed by operators using forceps/snare comparison (ground truth). Procedures were recorded, and AI-based polyp size estimates were obtained offline. The primary outcome was AI accuracy in size class determination (diminutive ≤5 mm, small 6-9 mm, large ≥10 mm). Secondary outcomes included size estimation in mm and impact on clinical management strategies.Among 465 polyps (307 diminutive, 107 small, 51 large) from 217 patients (mean age 61.9 [SD 10.4] years, 51.6% female), AI accuracy for size class determination was 85.8% (95%CI 82.5-88.8). Accuracy for diminutive, small, and large polyps was 93.3%, 74.6%, and 55.1%, respectively. The AI tool assigned 90.8% of patients to correct surveillance intervals and achieved mean absolute error of 1.13 mm and root mean square error of 1.40 mm for polyps ≤10 mm.The AI model performed similarly to expert endoscopists in clinically relevant size-related outcomes, potentially improving the accuracy and efficiency of CRC screening.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반