Enhanced Recovery After Surgery linked to lower CRS-HIPEC costs: micro-costing analysis in a European public hospital.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
An exploratory comparison between ERAS and non-ERAS management periods was performed.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The exploratory ERAS analysis suggests that even partial adherence may reduce postoperative stay and costs without increasing morbidity. These findings highlight the importance of perioperative optimisation to improve the clinical and economic efficiency of CRS-HIPEC programmes.
[BACKGROUND] Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is technically complex and resource-intensive.
- p-value p < 0.001
- p-value p = 0.02
- 95% CI 0.851-0.976
APA
González de Pedro C, Aparicio Sánchez D, et al. (2026). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery linked to lower CRS-HIPEC costs: micro-costing analysis in a European public hospital.. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 52(3), 111409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111409
MLA
González de Pedro C, et al.. "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery linked to lower CRS-HIPEC costs: micro-costing analysis in a European public hospital.." European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, vol. 52, no. 3, 2026, pp. 111409.
PMID
41579480 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is technically complex and resource-intensive. The primary objective of this study was to perform a detailed micro-costing analysis of CRS-HIPEC. As a secondary, exploratory objective, we evaluated whether adherence to an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway was associated with differences in postoperative resource utilisation and direct hospital costs.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] A retrospective observational analysis was conducted on all consecutive CRS-HIPEC procedures performed from 2021 to 2023 in a Spanish tertiary public centre. Resource use and cost determinants were assessed using micro-costing methods. An exploratory comparison between ERAS and non-ERAS management periods was performed.
[RESULTS] The median cost of CRS-HIPEC was €26,386. Higher expenditure was associated with longer hospital stays, higher PCI scores, need for anastomosis and infectious complications. ERAS and non-ERAS cohorts showed similar case complexity. Despite partial implementation, ERAS adherence was associated with shorter median hospital stay (8 vs 13 days, p < 0.001) and lower total median costs (€20,452.5 vs €27,346.7, p = 0.02), without an increase in severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III: 17.2 % vs 25.0 %, p = 0.454). The multivariable model (including PCI, anastomosis and severe complications) showed good discriminative performance for identifying high-cost cases (AUC = 0.923; 95 % CI 0.851-0.976).
[CONCLUSIONS] CRS-HIPEC costs are predominantly driven by hospital stay and complication-related resource utilisation. The exploratory ERAS analysis suggests that even partial adherence may reduce postoperative stay and costs without increasing morbidity. These findings highlight the importance of perioperative optimisation to improve the clinical and economic efficiency of CRS-HIPEC programmes.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] A retrospective observational analysis was conducted on all consecutive CRS-HIPEC procedures performed from 2021 to 2023 in a Spanish tertiary public centre. Resource use and cost determinants were assessed using micro-costing methods. An exploratory comparison between ERAS and non-ERAS management periods was performed.
[RESULTS] The median cost of CRS-HIPEC was €26,386. Higher expenditure was associated with longer hospital stays, higher PCI scores, need for anastomosis and infectious complications. ERAS and non-ERAS cohorts showed similar case complexity. Despite partial implementation, ERAS adherence was associated with shorter median hospital stay (8 vs 13 days, p < 0.001) and lower total median costs (€20,452.5 vs €27,346.7, p = 0.02), without an increase in severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III: 17.2 % vs 25.0 %, p = 0.454). The multivariable model (including PCI, anastomosis and severe complications) showed good discriminative performance for identifying high-cost cases (AUC = 0.923; 95 % CI 0.851-0.976).
[CONCLUSIONS] CRS-HIPEC costs are predominantly driven by hospital stay and complication-related resource utilisation. The exploratory ERAS analysis suggests that even partial adherence may reduce postoperative stay and costs without increasing morbidity. These findings highlight the importance of perioperative optimisation to improve the clinical and economic efficiency of CRS-HIPEC programmes.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
- Humans
- Retrospective Studies
- Female
- Male
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Middle Aged
- Length of Stay
- Spain
- Hospitals
- Public
- Hospital Costs
- Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures
- Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
- Aged
- Postoperative Complications
- Costs and Cost Analysis
- Neoplasms
- Adult
- Colorectal cancer
- Cost-analysis
- HIPEC
- Health care system
- Ovarian cancer
- Peritoneal surface malignancies
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.