본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Timing Intervals and Frequency of Adenoma Surveillance Colonoscopies in Central Queensland, Australia.

1/5 보강
ANZ journal of surgery 2026
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
294 patients with low-risk polyps, 20 with intermediate-risk polyps, 321 with high-risk polyps and 12 with very high-risk polyps during the study period (total n = 647).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] Despite outstanding and high-quality colonoscopy services being provided, higher than recommended colonoscopy surveillance was identified in the regional public hospitals in Central Queensland. Hospital processes should be improved to ensure appropriate intervals between procedures to avoid using scarce healthcare resources.

Ho YM, Merollini KMD, Collins LG

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[INTRODUCTION] The presence of colonic adenomatous polyps is a risk factor for colorectal cancer.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 647

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Ho YM, Merollini KMD, Collins LG (2026). Timing Intervals and Frequency of Adenoma Surveillance Colonoscopies in Central Queensland, Australia.. ANZ journal of surgery. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70517
MLA Ho YM, et al.. "Timing Intervals and Frequency of Adenoma Surveillance Colonoscopies in Central Queensland, Australia.." ANZ journal of surgery, 2026.
PMID 41772771
DOI 10.1111/ans.70517

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] The presence of colonic adenomatous polyps is a risk factor for colorectal cancer. Australian Guidelines changed in 2019 so that the surveillance colonoscopy intervals and polyp risk stratification were changed to reflect evidence available. The purpose of this research was to understand compliance with the Guidelines and implications for the health system.

[METHODS] Using routine hospital administrative datasets, all polyp surveillance colonoscopies performed from January 2018 to September 2020 in three government-funded hospitals in Central Queensland, Australia, were analysed. Colonoscopy intervals were calculated and compared with national recommendations. 'Early surveillance' was defined as greater than 6 months earlier than recommended. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess early surveillance or not, adjusted for potential confounding. Interval cancer and adenoma detection rates were also examined.

[RESULTS] Surveillance colonoscopies were performed for 294 patients with low-risk polyps, 20 with intermediate-risk polyps, 321 with high-risk polyps and 12 with very high-risk polyps during the study period (total n = 647). Early surveillance occurred in 566 (87.5%). The overall interval cancer rate was 0.9% (6/647), and adenoma detection rates were 62.2% (357/574) before the change of guidelines and 79.1% (53/67) after the change. No examined demographic or clinical factors were associated with early surveillance.

[CONCLUSION] Despite outstanding and high-quality colonoscopy services being provided, higher than recommended colonoscopy surveillance was identified in the regional public hospitals in Central Queensland. Hospital processes should be improved to ensure appropriate intervals between procedures to avoid using scarce healthcare resources.