No Effect of Computer-Aided Diagnosis on Colonoscopic Adenoma Detection in a Large Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Study.
3/5 보강
TL;DR
In patients over the age of 50 with mixed colonoscopy indications, CADe did not increase the adenoma detection rate and further studies should define the requirements for selective CADe use in routine clinical practice, particularly in relation to the examiner's baseline ADR.
연도별 인용 (2025–2026) · 합계 5
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI in cancer detection
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
In patients over the age of 50 with mixed colonoscopy indications, CADe did not increase the adenoma detection rate and further studies should define the requirements for selective CADe use in routine
- p-value P = 0.033
- 95% CI 1.23-1.59
APA
Katharina Zimmermann‐Fraedrich, Susanne Sehner, et al. (2026). No Effect of Computer-Aided Diagnosis on Colonoscopic Adenoma Detection in a Large Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Study.. The American journal of gastroenterology, 121(4), 881-889. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003500
MLA
Katharina Zimmermann‐Fraedrich, et al.. "No Effect of Computer-Aided Diagnosis on Colonoscopic Adenoma Detection in a Large Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Study.." The American journal of gastroenterology, vol. 121, no. 4, 2026, pp. 881-889.
PMID
40293139 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[INTRODUCTION] Multiple randomized studies have demonstrated that computer-assisted detection (CADe) improves the colonoscopic adenoma detection rate (ADR); however, these improvements have not been consistently reproduced in some more recent studies.
[METHODS] Patients aged 50 years and older undergoing outpatient colonoscopy in 12 German institutions were randomized to either the CADe group or the control group. The primary outcome parameter was the ADR, while secondary outcomes included the adenomas per colonoscopy rate, detection rates of different histologic subgroups, and adverse events. The median examiner-specific observed rates and examiner-adjusted rates were compared between treatment groups.
[RESULTS] One thousand six hundred twenty-seven patients were included (mean age 63.1 years, 39.8% female; 71% screening indications). The observed median examiner ADR was 40.0% (interquartile range 20.0%-57.1%) in the study vs 37.5% (inter-quartile range 20.0%-50.0%) in the control group. Similarly, adjusted overall ADR was 40.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35.8%, 45.5%) in the study and 38.3% (95% CI: 33.5%, 43.1%) in the control group. No differences were observed in adenomas per colonoscopy or any of the adenoma subgroups with regard to size, morphology, location, and histology as well as colonoscopy indication. The examiner had a large influence on ADR (adjusted median odds ratio [OR] 1.32), similar to patient age (OR per 10-year increase 1.40, 95% CI: 1.23-1.59) and sex (OR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.30-2.04). On the other hand, more hyperplastic polyps were found by CADe (OR for adjusted hyperplastic polyp detection rate = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.02-1.63; P = 0.033).
[DISCUSSION] In patients older than 50 years with mixed colonoscopy indications, CADe did not increase the ADR. Further studies should define the requirements for selective CADe use in routine clinical practice, particularly in relation to the examiner's baseline ADR.
[METHODS] Patients aged 50 years and older undergoing outpatient colonoscopy in 12 German institutions were randomized to either the CADe group or the control group. The primary outcome parameter was the ADR, while secondary outcomes included the adenomas per colonoscopy rate, detection rates of different histologic subgroups, and adverse events. The median examiner-specific observed rates and examiner-adjusted rates were compared between treatment groups.
[RESULTS] One thousand six hundred twenty-seven patients were included (mean age 63.1 years, 39.8% female; 71% screening indications). The observed median examiner ADR was 40.0% (interquartile range 20.0%-57.1%) in the study vs 37.5% (inter-quartile range 20.0%-50.0%) in the control group. Similarly, adjusted overall ADR was 40.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35.8%, 45.5%) in the study and 38.3% (95% CI: 33.5%, 43.1%) in the control group. No differences were observed in adenomas per colonoscopy or any of the adenoma subgroups with regard to size, morphology, location, and histology as well as colonoscopy indication. The examiner had a large influence on ADR (adjusted median odds ratio [OR] 1.32), similar to patient age (OR per 10-year increase 1.40, 95% CI: 1.23-1.59) and sex (OR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.30-2.04). On the other hand, more hyperplastic polyps were found by CADe (OR for adjusted hyperplastic polyp detection rate = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.02-1.63; P = 0.033).
[DISCUSSION] In patients older than 50 years with mixed colonoscopy indications, CADe did not increase the ADR. Further studies should define the requirements for selective CADe use in routine clinical practice, particularly in relation to the examiner's baseline ADR.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.