본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

No Effect of Computer-Aided Diagnosis on Colonoscopic Adenoma Detection in a Large Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Study.

3/5 보강
The American journal of gastroenterology 📖 저널 OA 20% 2021: 0/1 OA 2022: 0/1 OA 2023: 1/1 OA 2024: 3/8 OA 2025: 6/35 OA 2026: 8/41 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.121(4) p. 881-889 cited 5 Colorectal Cancer Screening and Dete
TL;DR In patients over the age of 50 with mixed colonoscopy indications, CADe did not increase the adenoma detection rate and further studies should define the requirements for selective CADe use in routine clinical practice, particularly in relation to the examiner's baseline ADR.
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex Semantic 마지막 보강 2026-05-01
연도별 인용 (2025–2026) · 합계 5
OpenAlex 토픽 · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection AI in cancer detection Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Zimmermann-Fraedrich K, Sehner S, Rösch T, Aschenbeck J, Schubert S, Liceni T

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

In patients over the age of 50 with mixed colonoscopy indications, CADe did not increase the adenoma detection rate and further studies should define the requirements for selective CADe use in routine

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P = 0.033
  • 95% CI 1.23-1.59

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Katharina Zimmermann‐Fraedrich, Susanne Sehner, et al. (2026). No Effect of Computer-Aided Diagnosis on Colonoscopic Adenoma Detection in a Large Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Study.. The American journal of gastroenterology, 121(4), 881-889. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003500
MLA Katharina Zimmermann‐Fraedrich, et al.. "No Effect of Computer-Aided Diagnosis on Colonoscopic Adenoma Detection in a Large Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Study.." The American journal of gastroenterology, vol. 121, no. 4, 2026, pp. 881-889.
PMID 40293139 ↗

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] Multiple randomized studies have demonstrated that computer-assisted detection (CADe) improves the colonoscopic adenoma detection rate (ADR); however, these improvements have not been consistently reproduced in some more recent studies.

[METHODS] Patients aged 50 years and older undergoing outpatient colonoscopy in 12 German institutions were randomized to either the CADe group or the control group. The primary outcome parameter was the ADR, while secondary outcomes included the adenomas per colonoscopy rate, detection rates of different histologic subgroups, and adverse events. The median examiner-specific observed rates and examiner-adjusted rates were compared between treatment groups.

[RESULTS] One thousand six hundred twenty-seven patients were included (mean age 63.1 years, 39.8% female; 71% screening indications). The observed median examiner ADR was 40.0% (interquartile range 20.0%-57.1%) in the study vs 37.5% (inter-quartile range 20.0%-50.0%) in the control group. Similarly, adjusted overall ADR was 40.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35.8%, 45.5%) in the study and 38.3% (95% CI: 33.5%, 43.1%) in the control group. No differences were observed in adenomas per colonoscopy or any of the adenoma subgroups with regard to size, morphology, location, and histology as well as colonoscopy indication. The examiner had a large influence on ADR (adjusted median odds ratio [OR] 1.32), similar to patient age (OR per 10-year increase 1.40, 95% CI: 1.23-1.59) and sex (OR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.30-2.04). On the other hand, more hyperplastic polyps were found by CADe (OR for adjusted hyperplastic polyp detection rate = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.02-1.63; P = 0.033).

[DISCUSSION] In patients older than 50 years with mixed colonoscopy indications, CADe did not increase the ADR. Further studies should define the requirements for selective CADe use in routine clinical practice, particularly in relation to the examiner's baseline ADR.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반