Use of Large Language Models to Determine the Surveillance Colonoscopy Interval: A Bi-Institutional Validation Study.
3/5 보강
TL;DR
LLM performance in determining the guideline-concordant post-polypectomy surveillance interval on a cohort of 1000 real-world colonoscopy and pathology report impressions is identified.
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
추출되지 않음
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
a screening or surveillance colonoscopy in 2023-2024 at 2 academic health centers were included
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Examples with 1-3 colon polyps had an average accuracy of 95.8% whereas examples with 4 or more colon polyps had an average accuracy of 88.2%, combined P value < 0.001. [DISCUSSION] LLMs with a custom prompt achieve consistently high accuracy in determining the guideline-based surveillance colonoscopy interval.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
AI in cancer detection
LLM performance in determining the guideline-concordant post-polypectomy surveillance interval on a cohort of 1000 real-world colonoscopy and pathology report impressions is identified.
APA
Vedant Acharya, Shivan J. Mehta, et al. (2026). Use of Large Language Models to Determine the Surveillance Colonoscopy Interval: A Bi-Institutional Validation Study.. The American journal of gastroenterology, 121(4), 950-963. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003864
MLA
Vedant Acharya, et al.. "Use of Large Language Models to Determine the Surveillance Colonoscopy Interval: A Bi-Institutional Validation Study.." The American journal of gastroenterology, vol. 121, no. 4, 2026, pp. 950-963.
PMID
41351229 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[INTRODUCTION] To determine the appropriate postpolypectomy colonoscopy surveillance interval, endoscopists synthesize information from colonoscopy and pathology report impressions and subsequently apply guideline-recommended interval algorithms, such as those developed by the United States Multi-Society Task Force. Given the complexity of these guidelines, this manual process is error-prone, necessitating automated tools, including large language models (LLMs), to improve guideline adherence. The primary aim of this study was to identify the LLM performance in determining the guideline-concordant postpolypectomy surveillance interval on a cohort of 1,000 real-world colonoscopy and pathology report impressions.
[METHODS] The data of patients who underwent a screening or surveillance colonoscopy in 2023-2024 at 2 academic health centers were included. Using a custom prompt outlining the US Multi-Society Task Force postpolypectomy surveillance algorithm, the LLM (GPT-4o) was asked to determine the appropriate surveillance interval for all 1,000 examples in the data set. This experiment, using the same model, prompt, and data set, was repeated 10 times; all experiments were conducted between January 27, 2025, and February 3, 2025.
[RESULTS] Across 10 experiments, the average accuracy was 94.6%. There was no significant difference in accuracy based on the institution from which the data originated or the presence of synchronous upper gastrointestinal endoscopy data within the pathology report impression. Examples with 1-3 colon polyps had an average accuracy of 95.8% whereas examples with 4 or more colon polyps had an average accuracy of 88.2%, combined P value < 0.001.
[DISCUSSION] LLMs with a custom prompt achieve consistently high accuracy in determining the guideline-based surveillance colonoscopy interval.
[METHODS] The data of patients who underwent a screening or surveillance colonoscopy in 2023-2024 at 2 academic health centers were included. Using a custom prompt outlining the US Multi-Society Task Force postpolypectomy surveillance algorithm, the LLM (GPT-4o) was asked to determine the appropriate surveillance interval for all 1,000 examples in the data set. This experiment, using the same model, prompt, and data set, was repeated 10 times; all experiments were conducted between January 27, 2025, and February 3, 2025.
[RESULTS] Across 10 experiments, the average accuracy was 94.6%. There was no significant difference in accuracy based on the institution from which the data originated or the presence of synchronous upper gastrointestinal endoscopy data within the pathology report impression. Examples with 1-3 colon polyps had an average accuracy of 95.8% whereas examples with 4 or more colon polyps had an average accuracy of 88.2%, combined P value < 0.001.
[DISCUSSION] LLMs with a custom prompt achieve consistently high accuracy in determining the guideline-based surveillance colonoscopy interval.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.