Efficacy and safety of second-line fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus ramucirumab according to prior first-line regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
2/5 보강
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
[BACKGROUND] Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus ramucirumab is a well-established second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) following bevacizumab-based chemoth
APA
Toshinori Yanagawa, Kozo Kataoka, et al. (2026). Efficacy and safety of second-line fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus ramucirumab according to prior first-line regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.. International journal of clinical oncology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-026-03010-5
MLA
Toshinori Yanagawa, et al.. "Efficacy and safety of second-line fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus ramucirumab according to prior first-line regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.." International journal of clinical oncology, 2026.
PMID
42018104
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus ramucirumab is a well-established second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) following bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. However, its efficacy after other first-line regimens, including anti-EGFR antibody-based and triplet chemotherapy, remains insufficiently characterized. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab between patients treated with different first-line treatment regimens.
[METHODS] This retrospective multicenter study included 186 mCRC patients who received second-line FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab between 2016-2025. Patients were classified into three groups based on their first-line regimens: Bmab (bevacizumab-based), EGFR (anti-EGFR antibody-based), and Triplet (triplet chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Survival outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a propensity score-stratified Cox proportional hazards model.
[RESULTS] The incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events, the median PFS and overall survival (OS) in the Bmab, EGFR, and Triplet groups were comparable (adverse events; 33.8%, 33.3%, 37.3%; PFS: 8.2, 8.6, and 8.7 months; and OS: 18.9, 23.0, and 17.8 months, respectively). In the propensity score-adjusted model using the Bmab group as the reference, no evidence of a difference was detected in PFS (adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI]: 1.84 [0.88-3.83] and 0.97 [0.66-1.45] in the EGFR and Triplet groups, respectively) or OS (1.26 [0.64-2.47] and 0.84 [0.55-1.29] in the EGFR and Triplet groups, respectively).
[CONCLUSIONS] In this retrospective real-world cohort, FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab appeared feasible after anti-EGFR antibody-based or triplet chemotherapy, with no clear signal of markedly different outcomes across prior first-line regimens.
[METHODS] This retrospective multicenter study included 186 mCRC patients who received second-line FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab between 2016-2025. Patients were classified into three groups based on their first-line regimens: Bmab (bevacizumab-based), EGFR (anti-EGFR antibody-based), and Triplet (triplet chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Survival outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a propensity score-stratified Cox proportional hazards model.
[RESULTS] The incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events, the median PFS and overall survival (OS) in the Bmab, EGFR, and Triplet groups were comparable (adverse events; 33.8%, 33.3%, 37.3%; PFS: 8.2, 8.6, and 8.7 months; and OS: 18.9, 23.0, and 17.8 months, respectively). In the propensity score-adjusted model using the Bmab group as the reference, no evidence of a difference was detected in PFS (adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI]: 1.84 [0.88-3.83] and 0.97 [0.66-1.45] in the EGFR and Triplet groups, respectively) or OS (1.26 [0.64-2.47] and 0.84 [0.55-1.29] in the EGFR and Triplet groups, respectively).
[CONCLUSIONS] In this retrospective real-world cohort, FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab appeared feasible after anti-EGFR antibody-based or triplet chemotherapy, with no clear signal of markedly different outcomes across prior first-line regimens.