본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Blood-Based Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Early Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review of Performance in Asymptomatic Screening Populations.

International journal of cancer 2026 🔓 OA Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
OpenAlex 토픽 · Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection Cancer Cells and Metastasis

Kahn CL, Rasmussen MW, Kleif J, Pedersen IS, Therkildsen C

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) via population-based screening programs can reduce incidence and mortality.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • Sensitivity 92%
  • 연구 설계 systematic review

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Caroline Ledertoug Kahn, Maria Wissing Rasmussen, et al. (2026). Blood-Based Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Early Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review of Performance in Asymptomatic Screening Populations.. International journal of cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70498
MLA Caroline Ledertoug Kahn, et al.. "Blood-Based Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Early Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review of Performance in Asymptomatic Screening Populations.." International journal of cancer, 2026.
PMID 42043732
DOI 10.1002/ijc.70498

Abstract

Early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) via population-based screening programs can reduce incidence and mortality. Current screening approaches are limited by cost, accessibility, compliance, and colonoscopy capacity. Blood-based screening of circulating tumor (ct) DNA may resolve some of these limitations. This systematic review evaluated the screening potential of blood-based ctDNA assays in asymptomatic screening populations. We systematically searched the PubMed database (final search June 20th, 2025) for studies detecting advanced adenomas (AAs) or CRC in asymptomatic cohorts, where a blood-based ctDNA assay had been evaluated with data on specificity, sensitivity, and/or AUC at early stages of disease. Newcastle-Ottowa scale was used for quality assessment. Only 20 studies of 454 unique hits met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 12 studies used assays targeting specific DNA alterations, while the remaining 8 studies used complex assays. Generally, comprehensive assays such as Shield, ColonSecure, and FMBT-CRC had the best performance for early-stage CRC detection with sensitivities of 71%-85% and specificities of 88%-90%. Despite being tested in a small cohort, the Coloscape assay was the only assay to reach sufficient AA detection with 59% sensitivity and 92% specificity. None of the reviewed ctDNA assays demonstrated sufficient sensitivities for both AA and early-stage CRC detection to be considered future screening tools. Screening tools based on ctDNA assays have not proved superior to fecal-based immunochemical test (FIT) yet. Future studies need to test ctDNA screening tools in large, prospective, asymptomatic cohorts emphasizing AA, and early-stage CRC.