Feasibility and safety profile of high-dose oxaliplatin-based PIPAC (120mg/m2) in the treatment of advanced peritoneal metastatic disease: MINOS real-life multicenter study.
2/5 보강
TL;DR
High-dose PIPAC-Ox is feasible and safe, however abdominal pain remains a main concern and continuous IV protocols should be considered routinely.
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
91 patients (53 male) diagnosed with unresectable PM of various origins; most patients (n = 62) having colorectal PM.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
the first PIPAC-Ox 120 mg/m, and 44 patients (48
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Local and histological response are well identified. However abdominal pain remains a main concern and continuous IV protocols should be considered routinely.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
High-dose PIPAC-Ox is feasible and safe, however abdominal pain remains a main concern and continuous IV protocols should be considered routinely.
- 표본수 (n) 62
APA
Diego A. Zambrano, Alexandru Lintis, et al. (2026). Feasibility and safety profile of high-dose oxaliplatin-based PIPAC (120mg/m2) in the treatment of advanced peritoneal metastatic disease: MINOS real-life multicenter study.. European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 52(5), 111731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2026.111731
MLA
Diego A. Zambrano, et al.. "Feasibility and safety profile of high-dose oxaliplatin-based PIPAC (120mg/m2) in the treatment of advanced peritoneal metastatic disease: MINOS real-life multicenter study.." European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, vol. 52, no. 5, 2026, pp. 111731.
PMID
41830675 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[INTRODUCTION] Oxaliplatin (Ox) is one of the recommended agents in Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) that benefitted of several phase I trials. Based on these data, the dose of 120 mg/m was suggested by an expert consensus for fit patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) of gastrointestinal cancers. The aim of the current study is to determine the real-life feasibility and safety profile of this regimen.
[MATERIAL AND METHODS] This retrospective study included all patients treated with PIPAC-Ox 120 mg/m in six referral centers specialized in PM. The patients were assessed for all potential toxicities associated to high dose oxaliplatin. Adverse events were expressed with the use of CTCAE for medical complications and Clavien-Dindo for surgical complications. Logistic regression and multivariate analysis were performed.
[RESULTS] 259 PIPAC procedures were performed in 91 patients (53 male) diagnosed with unresectable PM of various origins; most patients (n = 62) having colorectal PM. Concomitant IV 5FU was performed in 70 patients. All patients underwent the first PIPAC-Ox 120 mg/m, and 44 patients (48.3%) had ≥3 PIPAC. Abdominal pain was the most frequent grade III toxicity at the first PIPAC-Ox (n = 34) while 30 patients routinely received continuous IV opioids. Nausea-vomiting and ascites infection were the others grade III toxicity observed at PIPAC 1, one in each case respectively. After PIPAC 3, RECIST partial/stable response in 68.2%; PRGS 1-2 in 77.3% and negative cytology in 50% of patients.
[CONCLUSIONS] High-dose PIPAC-Ox is feasible and safe. Local and histological response are well identified. However abdominal pain remains a main concern and continuous IV protocols should be considered routinely.
[MATERIAL AND METHODS] This retrospective study included all patients treated with PIPAC-Ox 120 mg/m in six referral centers specialized in PM. The patients were assessed for all potential toxicities associated to high dose oxaliplatin. Adverse events were expressed with the use of CTCAE for medical complications and Clavien-Dindo for surgical complications. Logistic regression and multivariate analysis were performed.
[RESULTS] 259 PIPAC procedures were performed in 91 patients (53 male) diagnosed with unresectable PM of various origins; most patients (n = 62) having colorectal PM. Concomitant IV 5FU was performed in 70 patients. All patients underwent the first PIPAC-Ox 120 mg/m, and 44 patients (48.3%) had ≥3 PIPAC. Abdominal pain was the most frequent grade III toxicity at the first PIPAC-Ox (n = 34) while 30 patients routinely received continuous IV opioids. Nausea-vomiting and ascites infection were the others grade III toxicity observed at PIPAC 1, one in each case respectively. After PIPAC 3, RECIST partial/stable response in 68.2%; PRGS 1-2 in 77.3% and negative cytology in 50% of patients.
[CONCLUSIONS] High-dose PIPAC-Ox is feasible and safe. Local and histological response are well identified. However abdominal pain remains a main concern and continuous IV protocols should be considered routinely.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.