본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Characteristics and Effectiveness of Patient Navigation Programs on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-Up Colonoscopy Uptake: A Systematic Review.

메타분석 3/5 보강
AJPM focus 2026 Vol.5(3) p. 100471 cited 1 OA Colorectal Cancer Screening and Dete
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI PMC OpenAlex 마지막 보강 2026-04-28
OpenAlex 토픽 · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection Global Cancer Incidence and Screening Data-Driven Disease Surveillance

Pilar M, Hoover S, Roberson J, Jones M, Subramanian S

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[INTRODUCTION] Patient navigation is an evidence-based intervention that can be used to address patient-level barriers and ultimately increase colorectal cancer screening rates.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 연구 설계 systematic review

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Meagan Pilar, Sonja Hoover, et al. (2026). Characteristics and Effectiveness of Patient Navigation Programs on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-Up Colonoscopy Uptake: A Systematic Review.. AJPM focus, 5(3), 100471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focus.2025.100471
MLA Meagan Pilar, et al.. "Characteristics and Effectiveness of Patient Navigation Programs on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-Up Colonoscopy Uptake: A Systematic Review.." AJPM focus, vol. 5, no. 3, 2026, pp. 100471.
PMID 42005730

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] Patient navigation is an evidence-based intervention that can be used to address patient-level barriers and ultimately increase colorectal cancer screening rates. Because implementation can affect the effectiveness of navigation programs, it is important to study the implementation and effectiveness of the programs to inform future work.

[METHODS] The authors conducted a systematic review of English-language academic journal articles published from 2004 through 2023 and covering studies conducted in the U.S. After literature searches in 4 databases, reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts for potential relevance, followed by a full-text review of articles. The authors abstracted data from included articles, including study characteristics, cancer screening and intervention characteristics and outcomes (when provided), and screening outcomes. The authors assessed the quality of included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (ROB 2). The approach adhered to the PRISMA recommendations.

[RESULTS] The authors included 30 studies, and nearly all (=29) reported implementing multicomponent interventions, such as patient reminders, small media, mailed stool blood tests, and addressing structural barriers alongside navigation. Existing staff or healthcare providers, research team members, and lay people served as patient navigators. After implementing patient navigation as part of the intervention, most studies reported improvement in screening uptake, averaging 16.9 percentage points. Little information was provided on implementation outcomes.

[DISCUSSION] Patient navigation can be an effective strategy for improving colorectal cancer screening uptake. Further research is needed to understand implementation outcomes to bolster screening impact, inform resource allocation, promote equitable implementation, and improve patient outcomes.