Deep Learning Model-Based Architectures for Lung Tumor Mutation Profiling: A Systematic Review.
: Lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancers, exhibits marked heterogeneity that complicates molecular characterization and treatment selection.
APA
Ortuño-Miquel S, Roca R, et al. (2025). Deep Learning Model-Based Architectures for Lung Tumor Mutation Profiling: A Systematic Review.. Cancers, 17(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17223619
MLA
Ortuño-Miquel S, et al.. "Deep Learning Model-Based Architectures for Lung Tumor Mutation Profiling: A Systematic Review.." Cancers, vol. 17, no. 22, 2025.
PMID
41300986
Abstract
: Lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for approximately 85% of lung cancers, exhibits marked heterogeneity that complicates molecular characterization and treatment selection. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) have enabled the extraction of genomic-related morphological features directly from routine Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) histopathology, offering a potential complement to Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) for precision oncology. This review aimed to evaluate how DL models have been applied to predict molecular alterations in NSCLC using H&E-stained slides. : A systematic search following PRISMA 2020 guidelines was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies published up to March 2025 that used DL models for mutation prediction in NSCLC. Eligible studies were screened, and data on model architectures, datasets, and performance metrics were extracted. : Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria. Most employed convolutional neural networks trained on publicly available datasets such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to infer key mutations including EGFR, KRAS, and TP53. Reported areas under the curve ranged from 0.65 to 0.95, demonstrating variable but promising predictive capability. : DL-based histopathology shows strong potential for linking tissue morphology to molecular signatures in NSCLC. However, methodological heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and limited external validation constrain reproducibility and generalizability. Standardized protocols, larger multicenter cohorts, and transparent validation are needed before these models can be translated into clinical practice.