Serum miRNA and Metabolomic Signatures of Residential Radon Exposure in Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Residential radon is a leading environmental cause of lung cancer, but circulating biomarkers linking home exposure to pathogenic biology are not well defined.
APA
Han MTT, Thumvijit T, et al. (2025). Serum miRNA and Metabolomic Signatures of Residential Radon Exposure in Chiang Mai, Thailand.. Toxics, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13121021
MLA
Han MTT, et al.. "Serum miRNA and Metabolomic Signatures of Residential Radon Exposure in Chiang Mai, Thailand.." Toxics, vol. 13, no. 12, 2025.
PMID
41441242
Abstract
Residential radon is a leading environmental cause of lung cancer, but circulating biomarkers linking home exposure to pathogenic biology are not well defined. We conducted an exposure-contrast study in Hang Dong District, Chiang Mai, measuring indoor radon in 48 homes and enrolling adults from <50 Bq/m (low) and ≥100 Bq/m (high) households for serum profiling. Mean indoor radon was 61.8 ± 18.4 Bq/m (range 34-126), with 6.2% of homes ≥100 Bq/m. Small RNA sequencing identified 55 differentially expressed miRNAs (12 up, 43 down) in high-radon serum. Notably, miR-200b-3p, miR-200c-3p, and miR-194-5p were increased, while miR-3913-5p, miR-584-5p, miR-30a-3p, miR-22-3p, and miR-125a-5p were decreased. Target enrichment (KEGG/GO) implicated PI3K-Akt and MAPK hubs with Ras/Wnt/VEGF alongside focal adhesion/ECM-receptor/actin-cytoskeleton and immune-regulatory modules. Untargeted LC-MS metabolomics showed exposure-aligned shifts: higher PUFAs and oxylipins (e.g., AA, EPA; 9-HEPE, 8-HETE, 5,12-DiHETE), elevated acyl-carnitines (β-oxidation), and increased inosine/hypoxanthine, consistent with lipid/steroid remodeling, mitochondrial fuel reprogramming, oxidative stress, and nucleotide turnover. Integrated interpretation supports DDR/ATM → PI3K/Akt-MAPK activation with EMT/adhesion remodeling, angiogenic signaling, and immune modulation-linking residential radon to lung cancer mechanisms. Given the small sample size ( = 10), these findings should be interpreted as preliminary and hypothesis-generating, warranting validation in larger cohorts. Nevertheless, findings support household testing, remediation at ≥100 Bq/m, and integrated exposure studies considering PM2.5 co-exposures.