본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models in detecting lymph node metastases in lung cancer using endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) images: A bivariate meta-analysis.

Clinical imaging 2025 Vol.128() p. 110633

Ohannesian VA, Falcão L, Ishizuka BM, Menezes IR, Han ML, Suruagy-Motta RFO, Maximiano MLB, Cordeiro DMH, Baptista JM, Mariussi M, Taneja AK, Francisco Neto MJ, Garcia RG, Jacomelli M

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] This study systematically evaluated AI models for detecting lymph node metastases in lung cancer using EBUS images and assessed their role in thoracic oncology.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 0.68-0.95

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Ohannesian VA, Falcão L, et al. (2025). The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models in detecting lymph node metastases in lung cancer using endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) images: A bivariate meta-analysis.. Clinical imaging, 128, 110633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110633
MLA Ohannesian VA, et al.. "The diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models in detecting lymph node metastases in lung cancer using endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) images: A bivariate meta-analysis.." Clinical imaging, vol. 128, 2025, pp. 110633.
PMID 41092753

Abstract

[PURPOSE] This study systematically evaluated AI models for detecting lymph node metastases in lung cancer using EBUS images and assessed their role in thoracic oncology.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] A systematic search following PRISMA-DTA guidelines was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies using AI models with cytologic or histologic analysis as the reference standard were included (PROSPERO: CRD42025635581). A bivariate random-effects model pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC). AI models were categorized as CNN-A (Convolutional Neural Networks), BASM (Biomedical Application-Specific Models), AFP (Automated Frameworks and Platforms), and G-DDN (Generic Deep Neural Networks).

[RESULTS] Twenty-two studies were included. The pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.68-0.95), specificity 0.90 (95 % CI: 0.83-0.94), AUC 0.94 (95 % CI: 0.92-0.96), and DOR 56 (95 % CI: 17-182). CNN-A showed the highest accuracy, with an AUC of 0.970 and a DOR of 182, while AFP had the lowest sensitivity (0.058) and DOR (5.125), suggesting limited clinical applicability. Likelihood ratios were LR+ 8.39 (95 % CI: 4.93-14.28) and LR- 0.15 (95 % CI: 0.06-0.39), corresponding to post-test probabilities of 74 % for positive and 5 % for negative results. Subgroup analyses highlighted performance variations, emphasizing the need for refinement and validation in diverse settings.

[CONCLUSION] AI models demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy in detecting lymph node metastases in lung cancer using EBUS images, reinforcing their potential in clinical decision-making. Future studies should refine accuracy metrics and further evaluate CNN-A across disease contexts.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; Artificial Intelligence; Sensitivity and Specificity; Endosonography; Lymph Nodes

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)