Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy versus open or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention).
APA
Leão EI, Rocha A, et al. (2025). Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy versus open or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 12(12), CD016158. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD016158
MLA
Leão EI, et al.. "Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy versus open or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.." The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, vol. 12, no. 12, 2025, pp. CD016158.
PMID
41328686
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: Objective 1: to assess the effects of robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy versus conventional open lobectomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy in people with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Objective 2: to appraise full economic evaluations comparing robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with open lobectomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy for early-stage NSCLC by extracting data on resource use, costs, utilities, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) from societal and healthcare perspectives.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Lung Neoplasms; Pneumonectomy; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted; Systematic Reviews as Topic