Implementation fidelity of the blended optimal physical recovery after hospitalization (OPRAH) intervention for patients after oncological surgery.
무작위 임상시험
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
추출되지 않음
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
coaching from at least one of the two allied healthcare professionals
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS] OPRAH can support cancer survivors during a vulnerable phase of recovery, with the potential to improve physical outcomes. Sustainable implementation requires embedding the intervention into standard care and maintaining close collaboration among healthcare providers.
ℹ️ 이 논문은 무료 전문이 아직 없습니다. 코퍼스 전체의 43.9%는 무료 가능 (통계 →) · 🏥 기관 EZproxy로 시도
[PURPOSE] To evaluate the implementation fidelity of a blended intervention aimed at optimizing physical recovery following gastrointestinal or lung cancer surgery, involving patients, dietitians, and
- 연구 설계 Randomized Controlled Trial
APA
de Leeuwerk ME, van Westerhuis C, et al. (2025). Implementation fidelity of the blended optimal physical recovery after hospitalization (OPRAH) intervention for patients after oncological surgery.. Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01931-0
MLA
de Leeuwerk ME, et al.. "Implementation fidelity of the blended optimal physical recovery after hospitalization (OPRAH) intervention for patients after oncological surgery.." Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025.
PMID
41331231 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[PURPOSE] To evaluate the implementation fidelity of a blended intervention aimed at optimizing physical recovery following gastrointestinal or lung cancer surgery, involving patients, dietitians, and physiotherapist.
[METHODS] Implementation fidelity was evaluated alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) investigating the effect of the Optimal Physical Recovery After Hospitalization (OPRAH) intervention. For three months post-discharge, dietitians and physiotherapists remotely coached patients using data on physical activity and protein intake collected via a smartphone application and activity tracker. Carroll's framework guided the evaluation of the intervention using both quantitative and qualitative data.
[RESULTS] Patient adherence to wearing the activity tracker and monitoring protein intake was high. All patients received coaching from at least one of the two allied healthcare professionals. The frequency of coaching varied between patient populations, with the highest frequency for patients after gastrointestinal surgery. A negative moderating factor was that the OPRAH intervention was difficult to implement in the daily work routine. Positive moderating factors included positive responsiveness of physiotherapists, dietitians, and patients, well-functioning technology, and facilitation strategies that effectively engaged physiotherapists and dietitians.
[CONCLUSIONS] As adherence to the intervention was high, the observed effects of the RCT can be more confidently attributed to the OPRAH intervention. The main challenge for long-term implementation is integrating the intervention into routine clinical practice.
[IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS] OPRAH can support cancer survivors during a vulnerable phase of recovery, with the potential to improve physical outcomes. Sustainable implementation requires embedding the intervention into standard care and maintaining close collaboration among healthcare providers.
[METHODS] Implementation fidelity was evaluated alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) investigating the effect of the Optimal Physical Recovery After Hospitalization (OPRAH) intervention. For three months post-discharge, dietitians and physiotherapists remotely coached patients using data on physical activity and protein intake collected via a smartphone application and activity tracker. Carroll's framework guided the evaluation of the intervention using both quantitative and qualitative data.
[RESULTS] Patient adherence to wearing the activity tracker and monitoring protein intake was high. All patients received coaching from at least one of the two allied healthcare professionals. The frequency of coaching varied between patient populations, with the highest frequency for patients after gastrointestinal surgery. A negative moderating factor was that the OPRAH intervention was difficult to implement in the daily work routine. Positive moderating factors included positive responsiveness of physiotherapists, dietitians, and patients, well-functioning technology, and facilitation strategies that effectively engaged physiotherapists and dietitians.
[CONCLUSIONS] As adherence to the intervention was high, the observed effects of the RCT can be more confidently attributed to the OPRAH intervention. The main challenge for long-term implementation is integrating the intervention into routine clinical practice.
[IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS] OPRAH can support cancer survivors during a vulnerable phase of recovery, with the potential to improve physical outcomes. Sustainable implementation requires embedding the intervention into standard care and maintaining close collaboration among healthcare providers.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.
- Physiotherapy in the primary care oncology team.
- Updated systematic review and meta-analysis: taking the next step in physical activity behavioral interventions for post-treatment breast cancer survivors.
- Effect of enriched environment on postoperative sleep and recovery quality in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.
- Effect of ERAS-guided refined nursing on early mobilization after lung cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
- Thoracoscopic segmentectomy versus lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: efficacy, postoperative recovery, and prognosis.