Access to palliative care services within patient-sharing networks for patients with breast, colorectal and non-small cell lung cancers.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
891 patients, 6% received PC services, with higher rates observed for stage IV disease (15%) compared with stages I-III (3%).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
PC services, with higher rates observed for stage IV disease (15%) compared with stages I-III (3%)
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] Patient-sharing network analysis revealed limited integration of specialty PC, with most oncologists indirectly collaborating with PC specialists. Expanding the specialist workforce and strengthening collaboration are essential to improve access and quality of PC delivery.
[OBJECTIVES] Timely delivery of palliative care (PC) services improves outcomes for patients with cancer; however, utilisation remains low.
APA
Zhang W, Kaufmann TL, et al. (2025). Access to palliative care services within patient-sharing networks for patients with breast, colorectal and non-small cell lung cancers.. BMJ supportive & palliative care. https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005968
MLA
Zhang W, et al.. "Access to palliative care services within patient-sharing networks for patients with breast, colorectal and non-small cell lung cancers.." BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2025.
PMID
41386802
Abstract
[OBJECTIVES] Timely delivery of palliative care (PC) services improves outcomes for patients with cancer; however, utilisation remains low. This study aimed to determine access to PC clinicians for patients with early and advanced-stage cancer and assess collaboration with oncology physicians using patient-sharing networks.
[METHODS] Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data (2016-2019), we identified patients with stage I-IV breast, colorectal or non-small cell lung cancer. PC encounters within 12 months after diagnosis were included. PC clinicians were defined as those with at least one PC encounter and further categorised as formally trained PC specialists or non-specialists (billing code only). Patient-sharing networks evaluated the extent of collaboration between oncology physicians and PC specialists. Direct connections were defined as physicians sharing patients with a PC specialist; indirect connections as sharing patients with another clinician who was directly connected to a PC specialist.
[RESULTS] Among 100 891 patients, 6% received PC services, with higher rates observed for stage IV disease (15%) compared with stages I-III (3%). Only 33% of PC encounters were delivered by PC specialists (36% in stages I-III; 32% in stage IV). In 2019, 85% of medical oncologists had either a direct (16%) or indirect (69%) connection with a specialist.
[CONCLUSIONS] Patient-sharing network analysis revealed limited integration of specialty PC, with most oncologists indirectly collaborating with PC specialists. Expanding the specialist workforce and strengthening collaboration are essential to improve access and quality of PC delivery.
[METHODS] Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data (2016-2019), we identified patients with stage I-IV breast, colorectal or non-small cell lung cancer. PC encounters within 12 months after diagnosis were included. PC clinicians were defined as those with at least one PC encounter and further categorised as formally trained PC specialists or non-specialists (billing code only). Patient-sharing networks evaluated the extent of collaboration between oncology physicians and PC specialists. Direct connections were defined as physicians sharing patients with a PC specialist; indirect connections as sharing patients with another clinician who was directly connected to a PC specialist.
[RESULTS] Among 100 891 patients, 6% received PC services, with higher rates observed for stage IV disease (15%) compared with stages I-III (3%). Only 33% of PC encounters were delivered by PC specialists (36% in stages I-III; 32% in stage IV). In 2019, 85% of medical oncologists had either a direct (16%) or indirect (69%) connection with a specialist.
[CONCLUSIONS] Patient-sharing network analysis revealed limited integration of specialty PC, with most oncologists indirectly collaborating with PC specialists. Expanding the specialist workforce and strengthening collaboration are essential to improve access and quality of PC delivery.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- USP32 Promotes Cancer Cell Invasion, Macrophage M2 Polarization, and CD8+ T Cell Apoptosis in Gastric Cancer Through Upregulation of DAPK1.
- Challenges to case-only analysis for interaction detection using polygenic risk scores: model assumptions and biases in large biobanks.
- United multi-omics and machine learning refine regulatory T cell-defined hepatocellular carcinoma subtypes.
- A SLC7A5-Specific Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe for Cancer-Targeted Imaging Applications.
- Dynamic liver dysfunction predicts poor survival in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer and liver metastases treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.