Development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram for event-free survival in resectable non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.
1/5 보강
[BACKGROUND] Combining multiple prognostic factors can enhance risk assessment for resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- 표본수 (n) 208
- p-value p=0.013
- p-value p=0.006
- 95% CI 1.245-6.567
APA
Qu L, Sun W, et al. (2025). Development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram for event-free survival in resectable non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.. Frontiers in oncology, 15, 1682497. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1682497
MLA
Qu L, et al.. "Development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram for event-free survival in resectable non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.." Frontiers in oncology, vol. 15, 2025, pp. 1682497.
PMID
41476583 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Combining multiple prognostic factors can enhance risk assessment for resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our aim was to evaluate the prognostic significance of ypT staging, ypN staging, major pathologic response (MPR) and pathology response in lymph node, and to develop a combined prognostic model to predicting event-free survival in resectable NSCLC patients after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCI).
[METHODS AND RESULTS] Two independent cohorts (derivation, n=208; external validation, n=91) were utilized. Pathologic assessment and ypTNM staging followed recommendations from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) and the 8th edition AJCC TNM classification. The evaluation of lymph node is documented according to IASLC recommendations, and the mean metastatic tumor size (MTS) in lymph node was evaluated in each case. MPR was defined as ≤10% residual visible tumor in the tumor bed. The survival endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Univariate and multivariate survival analyses identified nonMPR (HR, 2.860; 95% CI, 1.245-6.567, p=0.013), ypT3/4 (HR, 3.987; 95% CI, 1.496-10.629, p=0.006), and MTS (MTS ≤ 4.5mm vs negative; HR, 4.059; 95% CI, 1.558-10.571, p=0.004; MTS>4.5mm vs negative; HR, 6.871; 95% CI, 1.713-27.564, p=0.007) were independent adverse prognostic factors in the derivation cohort. We built a nomogram model including ypT stage, MPR and pathology response in lymph node to predict EFS, demonstrating high efficacy in both derivation (the Area Under Curve, AUC = 0.77) and external validation cohorts (AUC = 0.72). The Risk Stratification System showed that the EFS of low-risk patients was considerably better than that of high-risk patients (P < 0.0001).
[CONCLUSIONS] Prognostic model integrating ypT staging, MPR and the mean MTS improves EFS prediction for NSCLC following NCI.
[METHODS AND RESULTS] Two independent cohorts (derivation, n=208; external validation, n=91) were utilized. Pathologic assessment and ypTNM staging followed recommendations from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) and the 8th edition AJCC TNM classification. The evaluation of lymph node is documented according to IASLC recommendations, and the mean metastatic tumor size (MTS) in lymph node was evaluated in each case. MPR was defined as ≤10% residual visible tumor in the tumor bed. The survival endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Univariate and multivariate survival analyses identified nonMPR (HR, 2.860; 95% CI, 1.245-6.567, p=0.013), ypT3/4 (HR, 3.987; 95% CI, 1.496-10.629, p=0.006), and MTS (MTS ≤ 4.5mm vs negative; HR, 4.059; 95% CI, 1.558-10.571, p=0.004; MTS>4.5mm vs negative; HR, 6.871; 95% CI, 1.713-27.564, p=0.007) were independent adverse prognostic factors in the derivation cohort. We built a nomogram model including ypT stage, MPR and pathology response in lymph node to predict EFS, demonstrating high efficacy in both derivation (the Area Under Curve, AUC = 0.77) and external validation cohorts (AUC = 0.72). The Risk Stratification System showed that the EFS of low-risk patients was considerably better than that of high-risk patients (P < 0.0001).
[CONCLUSIONS] Prognostic model integrating ypT staging, MPR and the mean MTS improves EFS prediction for NSCLC following NCI.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Combined Blepharoplasty and Brow Fat Pad Transfer for the Correction of Dermatochalasis and Sunken Upper Eyelids.
- Successful Treatment With Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy for Thoracic SMARCA4-Deficient Undifferentiated Tumor: A Patient Report and Literature Review.
- Foundation Model-Enabled Multimodal Deep Learning for Prognostic Prediction in Colorectal Cancer with Incomplete Modalities: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study.
- Comment on "Sarcopenia and myosteatosis are associated with low survival in patients receiving lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma".
- Comparison of Postoperative Scarring in Asian Women After Supra-brow and Sub-brow Blepharoplasty: A Retrospective Study.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- [Update on the regression grading of non-small cell lung cancer].
- Bone mineral density as a prognostic marker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.
- Exploratory Investigation Into Perioperative Treatment Strategies for Potentially Resectable Stage III-N2 Driver Gene-Negative Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Immunotherapy Era.
- Primary lung cancer with delayed drug-induced interstitial lung disease after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy: a case report.
- CT-based radiomics in predicting the efficacy of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Surrogate endpoints for survival in KEYNOTE-585: neoadjuvant/adjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.